kunit: tool: revamp message for invalid kunitconfig
The current error message is precise, but not very clear if you don't already know what it's talking about, e.g. > $ make ARCH=um olddefconfig O=.kunit > ERROR:root:Provided Kconfig is not contained in validated .config. Following fields found in kunitconfig, but not in .config: CONFIG_DRM=y Try to reword the error message so that it's * your missing options usually have unsatisified dependencies * if you're on UML, that might be the cause (it is, in this example) Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f57cc76ec
commit
c44895b6cd
@ -266,15 +266,17 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
|
||||
def validate_config(self, build_dir) -> bool:
|
||||
kconfig_path = get_kconfig_path(build_dir)
|
||||
validated_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path)
|
||||
if not self._kconfig.is_subset_of(validated_kconfig):
|
||||
if self._kconfig.is_subset_of(validated_kconfig):
|
||||
return True
|
||||
invalid = self._kconfig.entries() - validated_kconfig.entries()
|
||||
message = 'Provided Kconfig is not contained in validated .config. Following fields found in kunitconfig, ' \
|
||||
'but not in .config: %s' % (
|
||||
', '.join([str(e) for e in invalid])
|
||||
)
|
||||
message = 'Not all Kconfig options selected in kunitconfig were in the generated .config.\n' \
|
||||
'This is probably due to unsatisfied dependencies.\n' \
|
||||
'Missing: ' + ', '.join([str(e) for e in invalid])
|
||||
if self._arch == 'um':
|
||||
message += '\nNote: many Kconfig options aren\'t available on UML. You can try running ' \
|
||||
'on a different architecture with something like "--arch=x86_64".'
|
||||
logging.error(message)
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
def build_config(self, build_dir, make_options) -> bool:
|
||||
kconfig_path = get_kconfig_path(build_dir)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user