net/mlx5: Drop extra layer of locks in IPsec
There is no need in holding devlink lock as it gives nothing compared to already used write mode_lock. Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825062836.103744-4-saeed@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
390a24cbc3
commit
c46fb77383
@ -3903,38 +3903,28 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8 *mode)
|
||||
|
||||
bool mlx5_eswitch_block_encap(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev);
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw;
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch;
|
||||
|
||||
devl_lock(devlink);
|
||||
esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get(devlink);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(esw)) {
|
||||
devl_unlock(devlink);
|
||||
/* Failure means no eswitch => not possible to change encap */
|
||||
if (!mlx5_esw_allowed(esw))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&esw->mode_lock);
|
||||
if (esw->mode != MLX5_ESWITCH_LEGACY &&
|
||||
esw->offloads.encap != DEVLINK_ESWITCH_ENCAP_MODE_NONE) {
|
||||
up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
|
||||
devl_unlock(devlink);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
esw->offloads.num_block_encap++;
|
||||
up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
|
||||
devl_unlock(devlink);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mlx5_eswitch_unblock_encap(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev);
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw;
|
||||
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch;
|
||||
|
||||
esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get(devlink);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(esw))
|
||||
if (!mlx5_esw_allowed(esw))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
down_write(&esw->mode_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user