perf: RISC-V: Remove non-kernel-doc ** comments

This will presumably trip up some tools that try to parse the comments
as kernel doc when they're not.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 4905ec2fb7 ("RISC-V: Add sscofpmf extension support")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

--

These recently landed in for-next, but I'm trying to avoid rewriting
history as there's a lot in flight right now.

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322220147.11407-1-palmer@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Palmer Dabbelt 2022-03-22 15:01:47 -07:00 committed by Will Deacon
parent b2d229d4dd
commit c7a9dcea8e

View File

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info {
};
};
/**
/*
* RISC-V doesn't have hetergenous harts yet. This need to be part of
* per_cpu in case of harts with different pmu counters
*/
@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo(int nctr)
static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
{
/**
/*
* No need to check the error because we are disabling all the counters
* which may include counters that are not enabled yet.
*/
@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu)
cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
}
/**
/*
* This function starts all the used counters in two step approach.
* Any counter that did not overflow can be start in a single step
* while the overflowed counters need to be started with updated initialization
@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pmu_sbi_ovf_handler(int irq, void *dev)
/* Overflow status register should only be read after counter are stopped */
overflow = csr_read(CSR_SSCOUNTOVF);
/**
/*
* Overflow interrupt pending bit should only be cleared after stopping
* all the counters to avoid any race condition.
*/