drm/i915: Optimize out redundant dbuf slice updates
if the new dbuf slices are a superset of the old dbuf slices then we don't have to do anything in intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(). Restructure the code to skip such redundant dbuf slice updates. The main benefit is slightly less confusing logs. Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240402155016.13733-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
96c420d501
commit
c8361cd3c4
@ -3788,16 +3788,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
|
||||
intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
|
||||
const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
|
||||
intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
|
||||
u8 old_slices, new_slices;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!new_dbuf_state ||
|
||||
new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
|
||||
if (!new_dbuf_state)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
|
||||
new_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices | new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
|
||||
|
||||
if (old_slices == new_slices)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
|
||||
|
||||
gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
|
||||
old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
|
||||
new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
|
||||
gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
|
||||
@ -3807,15 +3811,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
|
||||
intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
|
||||
const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
|
||||
intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
|
||||
u8 old_slices, new_slices;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!new_dbuf_state ||
|
||||
new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
|
||||
if (!new_dbuf_state)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices | new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
|
||||
new_slices = new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
|
||||
|
||||
if (old_slices == new_slices)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
|
||||
|
||||
gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
|
||||
new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
|
||||
gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int skl_watermark_ipc_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user