net: dsa: qca8k: remove leftover phy accessors
commit 1eec7151ae0e134bd42e3f128066b2ff8da21393 upstream. This belated patch implements Andrew Lunn's request of "remove the phy_read() and phy_write() functions." <https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/902734/> While seemingly harmless, this causes the switch's user port PHYs to get registered twice. This is because the DSA subsystem will create a slave mdio-bus not knowing that the qca8k_phy_(read|write) accessors operate on the external mdio-bus. So the same "bus" gets effectively duplicated. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6b93fb46480a ("net-next: dsa: add new driver for qca8xxx family") Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22a8711fa5
commit
c9416ce920
@ -630,22 +630,6 @@ qca8k_adjust_link(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct phy_device *phy)
|
||||
qca8k_port_set_status(priv, port, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
qca8k_phy_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int phy, int regnum)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct qca8k_priv *priv = (struct qca8k_priv *)ds->priv;
|
||||
|
||||
return mdiobus_read(priv->bus, phy, regnum);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
qca8k_phy_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int phy, int regnum, u16 val)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct qca8k_priv *priv = (struct qca8k_priv *)ds->priv;
|
||||
|
||||
return mdiobus_write(priv->bus, phy, regnum, val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
qca8k_get_strings(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, uint8_t *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -961,8 +945,6 @@ static struct dsa_switch_ops qca8k_switch_ops = {
|
||||
.setup = qca8k_setup,
|
||||
.adjust_link = qca8k_adjust_link,
|
||||
.get_strings = qca8k_get_strings,
|
||||
.phy_read = qca8k_phy_read,
|
||||
.phy_write = qca8k_phy_write,
|
||||
.get_ethtool_stats = qca8k_get_ethtool_stats,
|
||||
.get_sset_count = qca8k_get_sset_count,
|
||||
.get_eee = qca8k_get_eee,
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user