tcp: remove dst refcount false sharing for prequeue mode
Alexander Duyck reported high false sharing on dst refcount in tcp stack
when prequeue is used. prequeue is the mechanism used when a thread is
blocked in recvmsg()/read() on a TCP socket, using a blocking model
rather than select()/poll()/epoll() non blocking one.
We already try to use RCU in input path as much as possible, but we were
forced to take a refcount on the dst when skb escaped RCU protected
region. When/if the user thread runs on different cpu, dst_release()
will then touch dst refcount again.
Commit 093162553c
(tcp: force a dst refcount when prequeue packet)
was an example of a race fix.
It turns out the only remaining usage of skb->dst for a packet stored
in a TCP socket prequeue is IP early demux.
We can add a logic to detect when IP early demux is probably going
to use skb->dst. Because we do an optimistic check rather than duplicate
existing logic, we need to guard inet_sk_rx_dst_set() and
inet6_sk_rx_dst_set() from using a NULL dst.
Many thanks to Alexander for providing a nice bug report, git bisection,
and reproducer.
Tested using Alexander script on a 40Gb NIC, 8 RX queues.
Hosts have 24 cores, 48 hyper threads.
echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_autocorking
for i in `seq 0 47`
do
for j in `seq 0 2`
do
netperf -H $DEST -t TCP_STREAM -l 1000 \
-c -C -T $i,$i -P 0 -- \
-m 64 -s 64K -D &
done
done
Before patch : ~6Mpps and ~95% cpu usage on receiver
After patch : ~9Mpps and ~35% cpu usage on receiver.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
32bc6d1a35
commit
ca777eff51
@ -1559,7 +1559,17 @@ bool tcp_prequeue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
skb_queue_len(&tp->ucopy.prequeue) == 0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
skb_dst_force(skb);
|
||||
/* Before escaping RCU protected region, we need to take care of skb
|
||||
* dst. Prequeue is only enabled for established sockets.
|
||||
* For such sockets, we might need the skb dst only to set sk->sk_rx_dst
|
||||
* Instead of doing full sk_rx_dst validity here, let's perform
|
||||
* an optimistic check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (likely(sk->sk_rx_dst))
|
||||
skb_dst_drop(skb);
|
||||
else
|
||||
skb_dst_force(skb);
|
||||
|
||||
__skb_queue_tail(&tp->ucopy.prequeue, skb);
|
||||
tp->ucopy.memory += skb->truesize;
|
||||
if (tp->ucopy.memory > sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
|
||||
@ -1765,9 +1775,11 @@ void inet_sk_rx_dst_set(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
||||
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
|
||||
inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex = skb->skb_iif;
|
||||
if (dst) {
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
|
||||
inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex = skb->skb_iif;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_sk_rx_dst_set);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -93,13 +93,16 @@ static struct tcp_md5sig_key *tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(struct sock *sk,
|
||||
static void inet6_sk_rx_dst_set(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
|
||||
const struct rt6_info *rt = (const struct rt6_info *)dst;
|
||||
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
|
||||
inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex = skb->skb_iif;
|
||||
if (rt->rt6i_node)
|
||||
inet6_sk(sk)->rx_dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
|
||||
if (dst) {
|
||||
const struct rt6_info *rt = (const struct rt6_info *)dst;
|
||||
|
||||
dst_hold(dst);
|
||||
sk->sk_rx_dst = dst;
|
||||
inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex = skb->skb_iif;
|
||||
if (rt->rt6i_node)
|
||||
inet6_sk(sk)->rx_dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void tcp_v6_hash(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user