sfc: handle VI shortage on ef100 by readjusting the channels
When fewer VIs are allocated than what is allowed we can readjust the channels by calling efx_mcdi_alloc_vis() again. Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c857946a4e
commit
ca7d05007d
@ -40,19 +40,26 @@ static int ef100_alloc_vis(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned int *allocated_vis)
|
||||
unsigned int tx_vis = efx->n_tx_channels + efx->n_extra_tx_channels;
|
||||
unsigned int rx_vis = efx->n_rx_channels;
|
||||
unsigned int min_vis, max_vis;
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
|
||||
EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->tx_queues_per_channel != 1);
|
||||
|
||||
tx_vis += efx->n_xdp_channels * efx->xdp_tx_per_channel;
|
||||
|
||||
max_vis = max(rx_vis, tx_vis);
|
||||
/* Currently don't handle resource starvation and only accept
|
||||
* our maximum needs and no less.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
min_vis = max_vis;
|
||||
/* We require at least a single complete TX channel worth of queues. */
|
||||
min_vis = efx->tx_queues_per_channel;
|
||||
|
||||
return efx_mcdi_alloc_vis(efx, min_vis, max_vis,
|
||||
NULL, allocated_vis);
|
||||
rc = efx_mcdi_alloc_vis(efx, min_vis, max_vis,
|
||||
NULL, allocated_vis);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We retry allocating VIs by reallocating channels when we have not
|
||||
* been able to allocate the maximum VIs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!rc && *allocated_vis < max_vis)
|
||||
rc = -EAGAIN;
|
||||
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ef100_remap_bar(struct efx_nic *efx, int max_vis)
|
||||
@ -133,9 +140,41 @@ static int ef100_net_open(struct net_device *net_dev)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = ef100_alloc_vis(efx, &allocated_vis);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
if (rc && rc != -EAGAIN)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Try one more time but with the maximum number of channels
|
||||
* equal to the allocated VIs, which would more likely succeed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
|
||||
rc = efx_mcdi_free_vis(efx);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
efx_remove_interrupts(efx);
|
||||
efx->max_channels = allocated_vis;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = efx_probe_interrupts(efx);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = efx_set_channels(efx);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = ef100_alloc_vis(efx, &allocated_vis);
|
||||
if (rc && rc != -EAGAIN)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
/* It should be very unlikely that we failed here again, but in
|
||||
* such a case we return ENOSPC.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
|
||||
rc = -ENOSPC;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rc = efx_probe_channels(efx);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user