scripts/bpf_doc.py: update logic to not assume sequential enum values
Relax bpf_doc.py's expectation of all BPF_FUNC_xxx enumerators having sequential values increasing by one. Instead, only make sure that relative order of BPF helper descriptions in comments matches enumerators definitions order. Also additionally make sure that helper IDs are not duplicated. And also make sure that for cases when we have multiple descriptions for the same BPF helper (e.g., for bpf_get_socket_cookie()), all such descriptions are grouped together. Such checks should capture all the same (and more) issues in upstream UAPI headers, but also handle backported kernels correctly. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006042452.2089843-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a76145a2e
commit
ce3e44a09d
@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
|
||||
self.desc_unique_helpers = set()
|
||||
self.define_unique_helpers = []
|
||||
self.helper_enum_vals = {}
|
||||
self.helper_enum_pos = {}
|
||||
self.desc_syscalls = []
|
||||
self.enum_syscalls = []
|
||||
|
||||
@ -264,42 +265,60 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
|
||||
# Searches for one FN(\w+) define or a backslash for newline
|
||||
p = re.compile('\s*FN\((\w+), (\d+), ##ctx\)|\\\\')
|
||||
fn_defines_str = ''
|
||||
i = 0
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
capture = p.match(self.line)
|
||||
if capture:
|
||||
fn_defines_str += self.line
|
||||
self.helper_enum_vals[capture.expand(r'bpf_\1')] = int(capture[2])
|
||||
helper_name = capture.expand(r'bpf_\1')
|
||||
self.helper_enum_vals[helper_name] = int(capture[2])
|
||||
self.helper_enum_pos[helper_name] = i
|
||||
i += 1
|
||||
else:
|
||||
break
|
||||
self.line = self.reader.readline()
|
||||
# Find the number of occurences of FN(\w+)
|
||||
self.define_unique_helpers = re.findall('FN\(\w+, \d+, ##ctx\)', fn_defines_str)
|
||||
|
||||
def assign_helper_values(self):
|
||||
def validate_helpers(self):
|
||||
last_helper = ''
|
||||
seen_helpers = set()
|
||||
seen_enum_vals = set()
|
||||
i = 0
|
||||
for helper in self.helpers:
|
||||
proto = helper.proto_break_down()
|
||||
name = proto['name']
|
||||
try:
|
||||
enum_val = self.helper_enum_vals[name]
|
||||
enum_pos = self.helper_enum_pos[name]
|
||||
except KeyError:
|
||||
raise Exception("Helper %s is missing from enum bpf_func_id" % name)
|
||||
|
||||
if name in seen_helpers:
|
||||
if last_helper != name:
|
||||
raise Exception("Helper %s has multiple descriptions which are not grouped together" % name)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# Enforce current practice of having the descriptions ordered
|
||||
# by enum value.
|
||||
if enum_pos != i:
|
||||
raise Exception("Helper %s (ID %d) comment order (#%d) must be aligned with its position (#%d) in enum bpf_func_id" % (name, enum_val, i + 1, enum_pos + 1))
|
||||
if enum_val in seen_enum_vals:
|
||||
raise Exception("Helper %s has duplicated value %d" % (name, enum_val))
|
||||
|
||||
seen_helpers.add(name)
|
||||
desc_val = len(seen_helpers)
|
||||
if desc_val != enum_val:
|
||||
raise Exception("Helper %s comment order (#%d) must be aligned with its position (#%d) in enum bpf_func_id" % (name, desc_val, enum_val))
|
||||
last_helper = name
|
||||
seen_enum_vals.add(enum_val)
|
||||
|
||||
helper.enum_val = enum_val
|
||||
i += 1
|
||||
|
||||
def run(self):
|
||||
self.parse_desc_syscall()
|
||||
self.parse_enum_syscall()
|
||||
self.parse_desc_helpers()
|
||||
self.parse_define_helpers()
|
||||
self.assign_helper_values()
|
||||
self.validate_helpers()
|
||||
self.reader.close()
|
||||
|
||||
###############################################################################
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user