dmaengine: fix missing 'cnt' in ?: in dmatest
Hi, On the latest tree my compiler has started giving the warning: drivers/dma/dmatest.c:575:28: warning: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ?true?, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses] The following patch fixes the missing middle clause with the same fix that Nicolas Ferre used in the similar clauses. (There seems to have been a race between him fixing that and the extra clause going in a little later). I don't actually know the dmatest code/structures, nor do I own any hardware to test it on (assuming it needs a DMA engine); but this patch builds, the existing code is almost certainly wrong and the fix is the same as the corresponding lines above it. (WTH is x=y?:z legal C anyway?) Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcd6c92267
commit
d07a74a546
@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, dma_dev->cap_mask)) {
|
||||
cnt = dmatest_add_threads(dtc, DMA_PQ);
|
||||
thread_count += cnt > 0 ?: 0;
|
||||
thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("dmatest: Started %u threads using %s\n",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user