iwlwifi: avoid variable shadowing
Change a few places to not shadow variables. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20220130115024.d53f2a7a9614.I7441559451d54b39dc0daeb4c31e5dce19d4d83e@changeid Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ad8860fc2c
commit
d4530f6368
@ -825,11 +825,11 @@ static void iwl_dbg_tlv_send_hcmds(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void iwl_dbg_tlv_apply_config(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt,
|
||||
struct list_head *config_list)
|
||||
struct list_head *conf_list)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct iwl_dbg_tlv_node *node;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(node, config_list, list) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(node, conf_list, list) {
|
||||
struct iwl_fw_ini_conf_set_tlv *config_list = (void *)node->tlv.data;
|
||||
u32 count, address, value;
|
||||
u32 len = (le32_to_cpu(node->tlv.length) - sizeof(*config_list)) / 8;
|
||||
|
@ -1042,12 +1042,12 @@ static bool iwl_mvm_remove_inactive_tids(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
* Remove the ones that did.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_set_bit(tid, &tid_bitmap, IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT + 1) {
|
||||
u16 tid_bitmap;
|
||||
u16 q_tid_bitmap;
|
||||
|
||||
mvmsta->tid_data[tid].txq_id = IWL_MVM_INVALID_QUEUE;
|
||||
mvm->queue_info[queue].tid_bitmap &= ~BIT(tid);
|
||||
|
||||
tid_bitmap = mvm->queue_info[queue].tid_bitmap;
|
||||
q_tid_bitmap = mvm->queue_info[queue].tid_bitmap;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need to take into account a situation in which a TXQ was
|
||||
@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static bool iwl_mvm_remove_inactive_tids(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
* Mark this queue in the right bitmap, we'll send the command
|
||||
* to the firmware later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(tid_bitmap & BIT(mvm->queue_info[queue].txq_tid)))
|
||||
if (!(q_tid_bitmap & BIT(mvm->queue_info[queue].txq_tid)))
|
||||
set_bit(queue, changetid_queues);
|
||||
|
||||
IWL_DEBUG_TX_QUEUES(mvm,
|
||||
|
@ -1602,8 +1602,6 @@ static void iwl_mvm_rx_tx_cmd_single(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
|
||||
seq_ctl = le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!seq_ctl)) {
|
||||
struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (void *)skb->data;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If it is an NDP, we can't update next_reclaim since
|
||||
* its sequence control is 0. Note that for that same
|
||||
|
@ -1307,10 +1307,10 @@ static inline dma_addr_t iwl_txq_gen1_tfd_tb_get_addr(struct iwl_trans *trans,
|
||||
dma_addr_t hi_len;
|
||||
|
||||
if (trans->trans_cfg->use_tfh) {
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tb *tb = &tfd->tbs[idx];
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfh_tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tb *tfh_tb = &tfh_tfd->tbs[idx];
|
||||
|
||||
return (dma_addr_t)(le64_to_cpu(tb->addr));
|
||||
return (dma_addr_t)(le64_to_cpu(tfh_tb->addr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
|
@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ static inline u8 iwl_txq_gen1_tfd_get_num_tbs(struct iwl_trans *trans,
|
||||
struct iwl_tfd *tfd;
|
||||
|
||||
if (trans->trans_cfg->use_tfh) {
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfh_tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
|
||||
return le16_to_cpu(tfd->num_tbs) & 0x1f;
|
||||
return le16_to_cpu(tfh_tfd->num_tbs) & 0x1f;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tfd = (struct iwl_tfd *)_tfd;
|
||||
@ -153,10 +153,10 @@ static inline u16 iwl_txq_gen1_tfd_tb_get_len(struct iwl_trans *trans,
|
||||
struct iwl_tfd_tb *tb;
|
||||
|
||||
if (trans->trans_cfg->use_tfh) {
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tb *tb = &tfd->tbs[idx];
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tfd *tfh_tfd = _tfd;
|
||||
struct iwl_tfh_tb *tfh_tb = &tfh_tfd->tbs[idx];
|
||||
|
||||
return le16_to_cpu(tb->tb_len);
|
||||
return le16_to_cpu(tfh_tb->tb_len);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tfd = (struct iwl_tfd *)_tfd;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user