scsi: pm80xx: Do not busy wait in MPI init check
We do not need to busy wait during mpi_init_check() since it is not being invoked in atomic context. mpi_init_check() is being called from pm8001_pci_resume(), pm8001_pci_probe(). Hence we are replacing udelay with msleep. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210109123849.17098-2-Viswas.G@microchip.com Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Signed-off-by: akshatzen <akshatzen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viswas G <Viswas.G@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Ruksar Devadi <Ruksar.devadi@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Radha Ramachandran <radha@google.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b61d041413
commit
d71023af4b
@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int mpi_init_check(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
|
||||
max_wait_count = SPC_DOORBELL_CLEAR_TIMEOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
do {
|
||||
udelay(1);
|
||||
msleep(FW_READY_INTERVAL);
|
||||
value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_IBDB_SET);
|
||||
value &= SPCv_MSGU_CFG_TABLE_UPDATE;
|
||||
} while ((value != 0) && (--max_wait_count));
|
||||
@ -1010,9 +1010,9 @@ static int mpi_init_check(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* check the MPI-State for initialization upto 100ms*/
|
||||
max_wait_count = 100 * 1000;/* 100 msec */
|
||||
max_wait_count = 5;/* 100 msec */
|
||||
do {
|
||||
udelay(1);
|
||||
msleep(FW_READY_INTERVAL);
|
||||
gst_len_mpistate =
|
||||
pm8001_mr32(pm8001_ha->general_stat_tbl_addr,
|
||||
GST_GSTLEN_MPIS_OFFSET);
|
||||
|
@ -220,8 +220,8 @@
|
||||
#define SAS_DOPNRJT_RTRY_TMO 128
|
||||
#define SAS_COPNRJT_RTRY_TMO 128
|
||||
|
||||
#define SPCV_DOORBELL_CLEAR_TIMEOUT (30 * 1000 * 1000) /* 30 sec */
|
||||
#define SPC_DOORBELL_CLEAR_TIMEOUT (15 * 1000 * 1000) /* 15 sec */
|
||||
#define SPCV_DOORBELL_CLEAR_TIMEOUT (30 * 50) /* 30 sec */
|
||||
#define SPC_DOORBELL_CLEAR_TIMEOUT (15 * 50) /* 15 sec */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Making ORR bigger than IT NEXUS LOSS which is 2000000us = 2 second.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user