drm/i915: Remove request->uniq
We already assign a unique identifier to every request: seqno. That someone felt like adding a second one without even mentioning why and tweaking ABI smells very fishy. Fixes regression from commit b3a38998f042b862f5ba4d7f2268f3a8dfb4883a Author: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Date: Thu Feb 19 16:30:47 2015 +0000 drm/i915: Fix a use after free, and unbalanced refcounting v2: Rebase Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> [danvet: Fixup because different merge order.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
423795cbac
commit
d7b9ca2f7a
@ -1823,8 +1823,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
|
||||
void (*stop_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
|
||||
} gt;
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t request_uniq;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
|
||||
* will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
|
||||
@ -2094,8 +2092,6 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request {
|
||||
/** process identifier submitting this request */
|
||||
struct pid *pid;
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t uniq;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The ELSP only accepts two elements at a time, so we queue
|
||||
* context/tail pairs on a given queue (ring->execlist_queue) until the
|
||||
|
@ -2532,7 +2532,6 @@ int i915_gem_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rq->ring = ring;
|
||||
rq->uniq = dev_priv->request_uniq++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (i915.enable_execlists)
|
||||
ret = intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras(rq, ctx);
|
||||
|
@ -505,7 +505,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
|
||||
TP_STRUCT__entry(
|
||||
__field(u32, dev)
|
||||
__field(u32, ring)
|
||||
__field(u32, uniq)
|
||||
__field(u32, seqno)
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
@ -514,13 +513,11 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
|
||||
i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
|
||||
__entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
|
||||
__entry->ring = ring->id;
|
||||
__entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
|
||||
__entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u",
|
||||
__entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
|
||||
__entry->seqno)
|
||||
TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u",
|
||||
__entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
|
||||
@ -565,7 +562,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
|
||||
TP_STRUCT__entry(
|
||||
__field(u32, dev)
|
||||
__field(u32, ring)
|
||||
__field(u32, uniq)
|
||||
__field(u32, seqno)
|
||||
__field(bool, blocking)
|
||||
),
|
||||
@ -581,14 +577,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
|
||||
i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
|
||||
__entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
|
||||
__entry->ring = ring->id;
|
||||
__entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
|
||||
__entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
|
||||
__entry->blocking =
|
||||
mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
|
||||
__entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
|
||||
TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
|
||||
__entry->dev, __entry->ring,
|
||||
__entry->seqno, __entry->blocking ? "yes (NB)" : "no")
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -540,7 +540,6 @@ static int execlists_context_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
|
||||
request->ring = ring;
|
||||
request->ctx = to;
|
||||
kref_init(&request->ref);
|
||||
request->uniq = dev_priv->request_uniq++;
|
||||
i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
i915_gem_request_reference(request);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user