tcp: move TCP_ECN_create_request out of header
After Octavian Purdilas tcp ipv4/ipv6 unification work this helper only has a single callsite. While at it, convert name to lowercase, suggested by Stephen. Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b7fc477b0
commit
d82bd12298
@ -861,40 +861,6 @@ static inline void tcp_ca_event(struct sock *sk, const enum tcp_ca_event event)
|
||||
icsk->icsk_ca_ops->cwnd_event(sk, event);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* RFC3168 : 6.1.1 SYN packets must not have ECT/ECN bits set
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we receive a SYN packet with these bits set, it means a
|
||||
* network is playing bad games with TOS bits. In order to
|
||||
* avoid possible false congestion notifications, we disable
|
||||
* TCP ECN negociation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Exception: tcp_ca wants ECN. This is required for DCTCP
|
||||
* congestion control; it requires setting ECT on all packets,
|
||||
* including SYN. We inverse the test in this case: If our
|
||||
* local socket wants ECN, but peer only set ece/cwr (but not
|
||||
* ECT in IP header) its probably a non-DCTCP aware sender.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
TCP_ECN_create_request(struct request_sock *req, const struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
const struct sock *listen_sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
|
||||
const struct net *net = sock_net(listen_sk);
|
||||
bool th_ecn = th->ece && th->cwr;
|
||||
bool ect, need_ecn;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!th_ecn)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ect = !INET_ECN_is_not_ect(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield);
|
||||
need_ecn = tcp_ca_needs_ecn(listen_sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ect && !need_ecn && net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn)
|
||||
inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
|
||||
else if (ect && need_ecn)
|
||||
inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* These functions determine how the current flow behaves in respect of SACK
|
||||
* handling. SACK is negotiated with the peer, and therefore it can vary
|
||||
* between different flows.
|
||||
|
@ -5906,6 +5906,40 @@ static inline void pr_drop_req(struct request_sock *req, __u16 port, int family)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* RFC3168 : 6.1.1 SYN packets must not have ECT/ECN bits set
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we receive a SYN packet with these bits set, it means a
|
||||
* network is playing bad games with TOS bits. In order to
|
||||
* avoid possible false congestion notifications, we disable
|
||||
* TCP ECN negociation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Exception: tcp_ca wants ECN. This is required for DCTCP
|
||||
* congestion control; it requires setting ECT on all packets,
|
||||
* including SYN. We inverse the test in this case: If our
|
||||
* local socket wants ECN, but peer only set ece/cwr (but not
|
||||
* ECT in IP header) its probably a non-DCTCP aware sender.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void tcp_ecn_create_request(struct request_sock *req,
|
||||
const struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
const struct sock *listen_sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
|
||||
const struct net *net = sock_net(listen_sk);
|
||||
bool th_ecn = th->ece && th->cwr;
|
||||
bool ect, need_ecn;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!th_ecn)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ect = !INET_ECN_is_not_ect(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield);
|
||||
need_ecn = tcp_ca_needs_ecn(listen_sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ect && !need_ecn && net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn)
|
||||
inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
|
||||
else if (ect && need_ecn)
|
||||
inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops,
|
||||
const struct tcp_request_sock_ops *af_ops,
|
||||
struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
@ -5966,7 +6000,7 @@ int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops,
|
||||
goto drop_and_free;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!want_cookie || tmp_opt.tstamp_ok)
|
||||
TCP_ECN_create_request(req, skb, sk);
|
||||
tcp_ecn_create_request(req, skb, sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (want_cookie) {
|
||||
isn = cookie_init_sequence(af_ops, sk, skb, &req->mss);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user