dax: Use non-exclusive wait in wait_entry_unlocked()
get_unlocked_entry() uses an exclusive wait because it is guaranteed to eventually obtain the lock and follow on with an unlock+wakeup cycle. The wait_entry_unlocked() path does not have the same guarantee. Rather than open-code an extra wakeup, just switch to a non-exclusive wait. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7566ec393f
commit
d8a706414a
16
fs/dax.c
16
fs/dax.c
@ -246,18 +246,16 @@ static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
|
||||
ewait.wait.func = wake_exceptional_entry_func;
|
||||
|
||||
wq = dax_entry_waitqueue(xas, entry, &ewait.key);
|
||||
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &ewait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlike get_unlocked_entry() there is no guarantee that this
|
||||
* path ever successfully retrieves an unlocked entry before an
|
||||
* inode dies. Perform a non-exclusive wait in case this path
|
||||
* never successfully performs its own wake up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
prepare_to_wait(wq, &ewait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
xas_unlock_irq(xas);
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
finish_wait(wq, &ewait.wait);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Entry lock waits are exclusive. Wake up the next waiter since
|
||||
* we aren't sure we will acquire the entry lock and thus wake
|
||||
* the next waiter up on unlock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (waitqueue_active(wq))
|
||||
__wake_up(wq, TASK_NORMAL, 1, &ewait.key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user