tcp: add rcu protection around tp->fastopen_rsk

Both tcp_v4_err() and tcp_v6_err() do the following operations
while they do not own the socket lock :

	fastopen = tp->fastopen_rsk;
 	snd_una = fastopen ? tcp_rsk(fastopen)->snt_isn : tp->snd_una;

The problem is that without appropriate barrier, the compiler
might reload tp->fastopen_rsk and trigger a NULL deref.

request sockets are protected by RCU, we can simply add
the missing annotations and barriers to solve the issue.

Fixes: 168a8f5805 ("tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - main code path")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet
2019-10-10 20:17:38 -07:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent 8caf8a91f3
commit d983ea6f16
11 changed files with 35 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -2666,7 +2666,7 @@ static void tcp_process_loss(struct sock *sk, int flag, int num_dupack,
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
bool recovered = !before(tp->snd_una, tp->high_seq);
if ((flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED || tp->fastopen_rsk) &&
if ((flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED || rcu_access_pointer(tp->fastopen_rsk)) &&
tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, false))
return;
@ -2990,7 +2990,7 @@ void tcp_rearm_rto(struct sock *sk)
/* If the retrans timer is currently being used by Fast Open
* for SYN-ACK retrans purpose, stay put.
*/
if (tp->fastopen_rsk)
if (rcu_access_pointer(tp->fastopen_rsk))
return;
if (!tp->packets_out) {
@ -6087,6 +6087,8 @@ reset_and_undo:
static void tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(struct sock *sk)
{
struct request_sock *req;
tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, false);
/* Reset rtx states to prevent spurious retransmits_timed_out() */
@ -6096,7 +6098,9 @@ static void tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen(struct sock *sk)
/* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV or TCP_FIN_WAIT_1,
* we no longer need req so release it.
*/
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk, false);
req = rcu_dereference_protected(tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk,
lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
/* Re-arm the timer because data may have been sent out.
* This is similar to the regular data transmission case
@ -6171,7 +6175,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
req = tp->fastopen_rsk;
req = rcu_dereference_protected(tp->fastopen_rsk,
lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
if (req) {
bool req_stolen;