wm97xx_battery: Use DEFINE_MUTEX() for work_lock
work_lock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_MUTEX() rather than explicitly calling mutex_init(). This patch also removes an unused bat_lock mutex. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
68597986f7
commit
daf22c3c44
@ -25,9 +25,8 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/irq.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(bat_lock);
|
||||
static struct work_struct bat_work;
|
||||
static struct mutex work_lock;
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(work_lock);
|
||||
static int bat_status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
static enum power_supply_property *prop;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -181,8 +180,6 @@ static int __devinit wm97xx_bat_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
|
||||
if (dev->id != -1)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_init(&work_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!pdata) {
|
||||
dev_err(&dev->dev, "No platform_data supplied\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user