powerpc/sstep: Fix sstep.c compile on powerpcspe
Commitbe96f63375
("powerpc: Split out instruction analysis part of emulate_step()") introduced ldarx and stdcx into the instructions in sstep.c, which are not accepted by the assembler on powerpcspe, but does seem to be accepted by the normal powerpc assembler even in 32 bit mode. Wrap these two instructions in a __powerpc64__ check like it is everywhere else in the file. Fixes:be96f63375
("powerpc: Split out instruction analysis part of emulate_step()") Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
31cdd0c39c
commit
dd21731022
@ -1818,9 +1818,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
__get_user_asmx(val, op.ea, err, "lwarx");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#ifdef __powerpc64__
|
||||
case 8:
|
||||
__get_user_asmx(val, op.ea, err, "ldarx");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1841,9 +1843,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
__put_user_asmx(op.val, op.ea, err, "stwcx.", cr);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#ifdef __powerpc64__
|
||||
case 8:
|
||||
__put_user_asmx(op.val, op.ea, err, "stdcx.", cr);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user