objtool: Handle GCC stack pointer adjustment bug
Arnd Bergmann reported the following warning with GCC 7.1.1: fs/fs_pin.o: warning: objtool: pin_kill()+0x139: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+88 cfa2=7+96 And the kbuild robot reported the following warnings with GCC 5.4.1: fs/fs_pin.o: warning: objtool: pin_kill()+0x182: return with modified stack frame fs/quota/dquot.o: warning: objtool: dquot_alloc_inode()+0x140: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+120 cfa2=7+128 fs/quota/dquot.o: warning: objtool: dquot_free_inode()+0x11a: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+112 cfa2=7+120 Those warnings are caused by an unusual GCC non-optimization where it uses an intermediate register to adjust the stack pointer. It does: lea 0x8(%rsp), %rcx ... mov %rcx, %rsp Instead of the obvious: add $0x8, %rsp It makes no sense to use an intermediate register, so I opened a GCC bug to track it: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81813 But it's not exactly a high-priority bug and it looks like we'll be stuck with this issue for a while. So for now we have to track register values when they're loaded with stack pointer offsets. This is kind of a big workaround for a tiny problem, but c'est la vie. I hope to eventually create a GCC plugin to implement a big chunk of objtool's functionality. Hopefully at that point we'll be able to remove of a lot of these GCC-isms from the objtool code. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6a41a96884c725e7f05413bb7df40cfe824b2444.1504028945.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Ingo Molnar
parent
499934898f
commit
dd88a0a0c8
@ -218,8 +218,10 @@ static void clear_insn_state(struct insn_state *state)
|
||||
|
||||
memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state));
|
||||
state->cfa.base = CFI_UNDEFINED;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < CFI_NUM_REGS; i++)
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < CFI_NUM_REGS; i++) {
|
||||
state->regs[i].base = CFI_UNDEFINED;
|
||||
state->vals[i].base = CFI_UNDEFINED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
state->drap_reg = CFI_UNDEFINED;
|
||||
state->drap_offset = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1201,24 +1203,47 @@ static int update_insn_state(struct instruction *insn, struct insn_state *state)
|
||||
switch (op->src.type) {
|
||||
|
||||
case OP_SRC_REG:
|
||||
if (cfa->base == op->src.reg && cfa->base == CFI_SP &&
|
||||
op->dest.reg == CFI_BP && regs[CFI_BP].base == CFI_CFA &&
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].offset == -cfa->offset) {
|
||||
if (op->src.reg == CFI_SP && op->dest.reg == CFI_BP) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* mov %rsp, %rbp */
|
||||
cfa->base = op->dest.reg;
|
||||
state->bp_scratch = false;
|
||||
} else if (state->drap) {
|
||||
if (cfa->base == CFI_SP &&
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].base == CFI_CFA &&
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].offset == -cfa->offset) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* drap: mov %rsp, %rbp */
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].base = CFI_BP;
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].offset = -state->stack_size;
|
||||
state->bp_scratch = false;
|
||||
} else if (!no_fp) {
|
||||
/* mov %rsp, %rbp */
|
||||
cfa->base = op->dest.reg;
|
||||
state->bp_scratch = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_FUNC("unknown stack-related register move",
|
||||
insn->sec, insn->offset);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else if (state->drap) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* drap: mov %rsp, %rbp */
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].base = CFI_BP;
|
||||
regs[CFI_BP].offset = -state->stack_size;
|
||||
state->bp_scratch = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
else if (op->dest.reg == cfa->base) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* mov %reg, %rsp */
|
||||
if (cfa->base == CFI_SP &&
|
||||
state->vals[op->src.reg].base == CFI_CFA) {
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is needed for the rare case
|
||||
* where GCC does something dumb like:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* lea 0x8(%rsp), %rcx
|
||||
* ...
|
||||
* mov %rcx, %rsp
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cfa->offset = -state->vals[op->src.reg].offset;
|
||||
state->stack_size = cfa->offset;
|
||||
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cfa->base = CFI_UNDEFINED;
|
||||
cfa->offset = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -1240,11 +1265,25 @@ static int update_insn_state(struct instruction *insn, struct insn_state *state)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (op->dest.reg != CFI_BP && op->src.reg == CFI_SP &&
|
||||
cfa->base == CFI_SP) {
|
||||
if (op->src.reg == CFI_SP && cfa->base == CFI_SP) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* drap: lea disp(%rsp), %drap */
|
||||
state->drap_reg = op->dest.reg;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* lea disp(%rsp), %reg
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is needed for the rare case where GCC
|
||||
* does something dumb like:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* lea 0x8(%rsp), %rcx
|
||||
* ...
|
||||
* mov %rcx, %rsp
|
||||
*/
|
||||
state->vals[op->dest.reg].base = CFI_CFA;
|
||||
state->vals[op->dest.reg].offset = \
|
||||
-state->stack_size + op->src.offset;
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user