use less confusing names for iov_iter direction initializers
READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are "data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as "we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly the wrong way. Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder to misinterpret... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@ -214,14 +214,14 @@ static inline int xprt_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
static int xprt_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
struct kvec *vec, size_t seek)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE, vec, 1, vec->iov_len);
|
||||
iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, vec, 1, vec->iov_len);
|
||||
return xprt_sendmsg(sock, msg, seek);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int xprt_send_pagedata(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
struct xdr_buf *xdr, size_t base)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iov_iter_bvec(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE, xdr->bvec, xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr),
|
||||
iov_iter_bvec(&msg->msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec, xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr),
|
||||
xdr->page_len + xdr->page_base);
|
||||
return xprt_sendmsg(sock, msg, base + xdr->page_base);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int xprt_send_rm_and_kvec(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
};
|
||||
size_t len = iov[0].iov_len + iov[1].iov_len;
|
||||
|
||||
iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, WRITE, iov, 2, len);
|
||||
iov_iter_kvec(&msg->msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iov, 2, len);
|
||||
return xprt_sendmsg(sock, msg, base);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user