Btrfs: fix unnecessary while loop when search the free space, cache
When we find a bitmap free space entry, we may check the previous extent entry covers the offset or not. But if we find this entry is also a bitmap entry, we will continue to check the previous entry of the current one by a while loop. It is unnecessary because it is impossible that the extent entry which is in front of a bitmap entry can cover the offset of the entry after that bitmap entry. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
de1ee92ac3
commit
de6c4115a2
@ -1250,18 +1250,13 @@ tree_search_offset(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
|
||||
* if previous extent entry covers the offset,
|
||||
* we should return it instead of the bitmap entry
|
||||
*/
|
||||
n = &entry->offset_index;
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
n = rb_prev(n);
|
||||
if (!n)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
n = rb_prev(&entry->offset_index);
|
||||
if (n) {
|
||||
prev = rb_entry(n, struct btrfs_free_space,
|
||||
offset_index);
|
||||
if (!prev->bitmap) {
|
||||
if (prev->offset + prev->bytes > offset)
|
||||
entry = prev;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!prev->bitmap &&
|
||||
prev->offset + prev->bytes > offset)
|
||||
entry = prev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return entry;
|
||||
@ -1287,18 +1282,13 @@ tree_search_offset(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (entry->bitmap) {
|
||||
n = &entry->offset_index;
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
n = rb_prev(n);
|
||||
if (!n)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
n = rb_prev(&entry->offset_index);
|
||||
if (n) {
|
||||
prev = rb_entry(n, struct btrfs_free_space,
|
||||
offset_index);
|
||||
if (!prev->bitmap) {
|
||||
if (prev->offset + prev->bytes > offset)
|
||||
return prev;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!prev->bitmap &&
|
||||
prev->offset + prev->bytes > offset)
|
||||
return prev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (entry->offset + BITS_PER_BITMAP * ctl->unit > offset)
|
||||
return entry;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user