s390/mm: Fix VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling in do_exception()

There is no support for HWPOISON, MEMORY_FAILURE, or ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC on
s390. Therefore we do not expect to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in
do_exception().

However, since commit af19487f00 ("mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more
general"), it is possible to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in combination with
PTE_MARKER_POISONED, even on architectures that do not support HWPOISON
otherwise. In this case, we will end up on the BUG() in do_exception().

Fix this by treating VM_FAULT_HWPOISON the same as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, similar
to x86 when MEMORY_FAILURE is not configured. Also print unexpected fault
flags, for easier debugging.

Note that VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE is not expected, because s390 cannot
support swap entries on other levels than PTE level.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Fixes: af19487f00 ("mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more general")
Reported-by: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20240715180416.3632453-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gerald Schaefer 2024-07-15 20:04:16 +02:00 committed by Vasily Gorbik
parent 275d05ce06
commit df39038cd8

View File

@ -433,12 +433,13 @@ error:
handle_fault_error_nolock(regs, 0);
else
do_sigsegv(regs, SEGV_MAPERR);
} else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS) {
} else if (fault & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_HWPOISON)) {
if (!user_mode(regs))
handle_fault_error_nolock(regs, 0);
else
do_sigbus(regs);
} else {
pr_emerg("Unexpected fault flags: %08x\n", fault);
BUG();
}
}