s390/mm: Fix VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling in do_exception()
There is no support for HWPOISON, MEMORY_FAILURE, or ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC on s390. Therefore we do not expect to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in do_exception(). However, since commitaf19487f00
("mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more general"), it is possible to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in combination with PTE_MARKER_POISONED, even on architectures that do not support HWPOISON otherwise. In this case, we will end up on the BUG() in do_exception(). Fix this by treating VM_FAULT_HWPOISON the same as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, similar to x86 when MEMORY_FAILURE is not configured. Also print unexpected fault flags, for easier debugging. Note that VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE is not expected, because s390 cannot support swap entries on other levels than PTE level. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Fixes:af19487f00
("mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more general") Reported-by: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@gmail.com> Tested-by: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20240715180416.3632453-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
275d05ce06
commit
df39038cd8
@ -433,12 +433,13 @@ error:
|
||||
handle_fault_error_nolock(regs, 0);
|
||||
else
|
||||
do_sigsegv(regs, SEGV_MAPERR);
|
||||
} else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS) {
|
||||
} else if (fault & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_HWPOISON)) {
|
||||
if (!user_mode(regs))
|
||||
handle_fault_error_nolock(regs, 0);
|
||||
else
|
||||
do_sigbus(regs);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pr_emerg("Unexpected fault flags: %08x\n", fault);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user