gpiolib / ACPI: allow passing GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW for GpioInt resources
The ACPI GpioInt resources contain polarity field that is used to specify whether the interrupt is active high or low. Since gpiolib supports GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW we can pass this information in the flags field in acpi_find_gpio(), analogous to the DeviceTree version. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
81f59e9d13
commit
e01f440a68
@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ static int acpi_find_gpio(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
|
||||
agpio->pin_table[0]);
|
||||
lookup->info.gpioint =
|
||||
agpio->connection_type == ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_INT;
|
||||
lookup->info.active_low =
|
||||
agpio->polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
@ -2264,7 +2264,17 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
|
||||
static struct gpio_desc *acpi_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
|
||||
unsigned int idx, unsigned long *flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(dev, idx, NULL);
|
||||
struct acpi_gpio_info info;
|
||||
struct gpio_desc *desc;
|
||||
|
||||
desc = acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(dev, idx, &info);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(desc))
|
||||
return desc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (info.gpioint && info.active_low)
|
||||
*flags |= GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW;
|
||||
|
||||
return desc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
|
||||
|
@ -10,9 +10,11 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* struct acpi_gpio_info - ACPI GPIO specific information
|
||||
* @gpioint: if %true this GPIO is of type GpioInt otherwise type is GpioIo
|
||||
* @active_low: in case of @gpioint, the pin is active low
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct acpi_gpio_info {
|
||||
bool gpioint;
|
||||
bool active_low;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user