raid5: get_active_stripe avoids device_lock
For sequential workload (or request size big workload), get_active_stripe can find cached stripe. In this case, we always hold device_lock, which exposes a lot of lock contention for such workload. If stripe count isn't 0, we don't need hold the lock actually, since we just increase its count. And this is the hot code path for such workload. Unfortunately we must delete the BUG_ON. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
27c0f68f07
commit
e240c1839d
@ -679,14 +679,9 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
|
||||
init_stripe(sh, sector, previous);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&sh->count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
} else if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru)
|
||||
&& !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)
|
||||
&& !test_bit(STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST, &sh->state)
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
|
||||
if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
|
||||
atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
|
||||
BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user