Revert "ath10k: fix napi_poll budget overflow"
Thorsten reported on <fa6e3ee2-91b5-a54b-afe3-87f30aac7a48@leemhuis.info> that
commit c9353bf483
made ath10k unstable with QCA6174 on his Dell XPS13 (9360)
with an error message:
ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: failed to extract amsdu: -11
It only seemed to happen with certain APs, not all, but when it happened the
only way to get ath10k working was to switch the wifi off and on with a hotkey.
As this commit made things even worse (a warning vs breaking the whole
connection) let's revert the commit for now and while the issue is being fixed.
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2017-October/010227.html
Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7eccb738fc
commit
e48e9c429a
@ -1818,8 +1818,7 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_delba(struct ath10k *ar, struct htt_resp *resp)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list,
|
||||
struct sk_buff_head *amsdu,
|
||||
int budget_left)
|
||||
struct sk_buff_head *amsdu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sk_buff *msdu;
|
||||
struct htt_rx_desc *rxd;
|
||||
@ -1830,9 +1829,8 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list,
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(!skb_queue_empty(amsdu)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list)) && budget_left) {
|
||||
while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list))) {
|
||||
__skb_queue_tail(amsdu, msdu);
|
||||
budget_left--;
|
||||
|
||||
rxd = (void *)msdu->data - sizeof(*rxd);
|
||||
if (rxd->msdu_end.common.info0 &
|
||||
@ -1923,8 +1921,7 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(struct ath10k *ar,
|
||||
return num_msdu;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
int budget_left)
|
||||
static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ath10k_htt *htt = &ar->htt;
|
||||
struct htt_resp *resp = (void *)skb->data;
|
||||
@ -1981,9 +1978,9 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
if (offload)
|
||||
num_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(ar, &list);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!skb_queue_empty(&list) && budget_left) {
|
||||
while (!skb_queue_empty(&list)) {
|
||||
__skb_queue_head_init(&amsdu);
|
||||
ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu, budget_left);
|
||||
ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu);
|
||||
switch (ret) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
/* Note: The in-order indication may report interleaved
|
||||
@ -1993,7 +1990,6 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
* should still give an idea about rx rate to the user.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
num_msdus += skb_queue_len(&amsdu);
|
||||
budget_left -= skb_queue_len(&amsdu);
|
||||
ath10k_htt_rx_h_ppdu(ar, &amsdu, status, vdev_id);
|
||||
ath10k_htt_rx_h_filter(ar, &amsdu, status);
|
||||
ath10k_htt_rx_h_mpdu(ar, &amsdu, status, false);
|
||||
@ -2636,8 +2632,7 @@ int ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(struct ath10k *ar, int budget)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
|
||||
num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb,
|
||||
(budget - quota));
|
||||
num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
|
||||
if (num_rx_msdus < 0) {
|
||||
resched_napi = true;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user