drm/dp_mst: Correct the bug in drm_dp_update_payload_part1()
[Why] If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the index to next one after shuffling payloads. [How] Drop the i++ increasing part in for loop head and decide whether to increase the index or not according to payload_state of current payload. Changes since v1: * Refine the code to have it easy reading * Amend the commit message to meet the way code is modified now. Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 706246c761dd ("drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()") Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.1+ [Added cc for stable] Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203042423.5961-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9c148cfaf
commit
e5a6ca27eb
@ -3176,9 +3176,11 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
|
||||
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
|
||||
if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL)
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; /* do nothing */) {
|
||||
if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state != DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL) {
|
||||
i++;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("removing payload %d\n", i);
|
||||
for (j = i; j < mgr->max_payloads - 1; j++) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user