btrfs: balance: use term redundancy instead of integrity in message
When balance reduces the number of copies of metadata, it reduces the redundancy, use the term redundancy instead of integrity. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f95ec012c
commit
e62869be1e
@ -4036,7 +4036,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u64 num_devices;
|
||||
unsigned seq;
|
||||
bool reducing_integrity;
|
||||
bool reducing_redundancy;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info) ||
|
||||
@ -4119,9 +4119,9 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
((bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
|
||||
(fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits & allowed) &&
|
||||
!(bctl->meta.target & allowed)))
|
||||
reducing_integrity = true;
|
||||
reducing_redundancy = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
reducing_integrity = false;
|
||||
reducing_redundancy = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* if we're not converting, the target field is uninitialized */
|
||||
meta_target = (bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) ?
|
||||
@ -4130,13 +4130,13 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
bctl->data.target : fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits;
|
||||
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
|
||||
|
||||
if (reducing_integrity) {
|
||||
if (reducing_redundancy) {
|
||||
if (bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_FORCE) {
|
||||
btrfs_info(fs_info,
|
||||
"balance: force reducing metadata integrity");
|
||||
"balance: force reducing metadata redundancy");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
"balance: reduces metadata integrity, use --force if you want this");
|
||||
"balance: reduces metadata redundancy, use --force if you want this");
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user