vhost: use mutex_lock_nested() in vhost_dev_lock_vqs()
We used to call mutex_lock() in vhost_dev_lock_vqs() which tries to
hold mutexes of all virtqueues. This may confuse lockdep to report a
possible deadlock because of trying to hold locks belong to same
class. Switch to use mutex_lock_nested() to avoid false positive.
Fixes: 6b1e6cc785
("vhost: new device IOTLB API")
Reported-by: syzbot+dbb7c1161485e61b0241@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b7051cb8da
commit
e9cb423913
@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
|
||||
mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user