workqueue: Fix flag collision
commit fbf1c41fc0f4d3574ac2377245efd666c1fa3075 upstream. Commit 0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be overridable") introduced a __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT flag but gave it the same value as __WQ_LEGACY. I don't believe these were intended to mean the same thing, so renumber __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT. Fixes: 0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be ...") Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
25bdc516b5
commit
ec552ece1f
@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ enum {
|
||||
|
||||
__WQ_DRAINING = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
|
||||
__WQ_ORDERED = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
|
||||
__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
|
||||
__WQ_LEGACY = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */
|
||||
__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 19, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
|
||||
|
||||
WQ_MAX_ACTIVE = 512, /* I like 512, better ideas? */
|
||||
WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU = 4, /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user