iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: allow adjusted map element values to spill

Browse Source 
commit 484611357c ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
introduces the ability to do pointer math inside a map element value via
the PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ register type.

The current support doesn't handle the case where a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ
is spilled into the stack, limiting several use cases, especially when
generating bpf code from a compiler.

Handle this case by explicitly enabling the register type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ to be spilled. Also, make sure that min_value and
max_value are reset just for BPF_LDX operations that don't result in a
restore of a spilled register from stack.

Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Gianluca Borello 2017-01-09 10:19:48 -08:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 5722569bb9
commit f0318d01b6
2 changed files with 62 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -481,6 +481,13 @@ static void reset_reg_range_values(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
regs[regno].max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
}
static void mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs,
u32 regno)
{
mark_reg_unknown_value(regs, regno);
reset_reg_range_values(regs, regno);
}
enum reg_arg_type {
SRC_OP, /* register is used as source operand */
DST_OP, /* register is used as destination operand */
@ -532,6 +539,7 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
switch (type) {
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL:
case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ:
case PTR_TO_STACK:
case PTR_TO_CTX:
case PTR_TO_PACKET:
@ -616,7 +624,8 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size,
}
if (value_regno >= 0)
/* have read misc data from the stack */
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
value_regno);
return 0;
}
}
@ -825,7 +834,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
else
err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
value_regno);
} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) {
enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = UNKNOWN_VALUE;
@ -837,7 +847,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
}
err = check_ctx_access(env, off, size, t, &reg_type);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
value_regno);
/* note that reg.[id|off|range] == 0 */
state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type;
}
@ -870,7 +881,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
}
err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
mark_reg_unknown_value(state->regs, value_regno);
mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
value_regno);
} else {
verbose("R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n",
regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]);
@ -2744,7 +2756,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (err)
return err;
reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg);
if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W &&
BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) {
insn_idx++;

46
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
View File

@ -3396,6 +3396,52 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
},
{
"map element value is preserved across register spilling",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 42),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -184),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 42),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr",
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
},
{
"map element value (adjusted) is preserved across register spilling",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0,
offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 42),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -184),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, 0, 42),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map2 = { 3 },
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
},
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)