iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

xfrm: Fix RCU vs hash_resize_mutex lock inversion

Browse Source 
commit 2580d3f40022642452dd8422bfb8c22e54cf84bb upstream.

xfrm_bydst_resize() calls synchronize_rcu() while holding
hash_resize_mutex. But then on PREEMPT_RT configurations,
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() may acquire that mutex while running in an
RCU read side critical section. This results in a deadlock.

In fact the scope of hash_resize_mutex is way beyond the purpose of
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() to just fetch a coherent and stable policy
for a given destination/direction, along with other details.

The lower level net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock, which among other things
protects per destination/direction references to policy entries, is
enough to serialize and benefit from priority inheritance against the
write side. As a bonus, it makes it officially a per network namespace
synchronization business where a policy table resize on namespace A
shouldn't block a policy lookup on namespace B.

Fixes: 77cc278f7b20 (xfrm: policy: Use sequence counters with associated lock)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Frederic Weisbecker 2021-06-28 15:34:28 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 23e36a8610
commit f08b2d078c
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
include/net/netns/xfrm.h
View File

@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct netns_xfrm {
#endif
spinlock_t xfrm_state_lock;
seqcount_t xfrm_state_hash_generation;
seqcount_spinlock_t xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
spinlock_t xfrm_policy_lock;
struct mutex xfrm_cfg_mutex;

17
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
View File

@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo const __rcu *xfrm_policy_afinfo[AF_INET6 + 1]
__read_mostly;
static struct kmem_cache *xfrm_dst_cache __ro_after_init;
static __read_mostly seqcount_mutex_t xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
static struct rhashtable xfrm_policy_inexact_table;
static const struct rhashtable_params xfrm_pol_inexact_params;
@ -585,7 +584,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net *net, int dir)
return;
spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
odst = rcu_dereference_protected(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table,
lockdep_is_held(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock));
@ -596,7 +595,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net *net, int dir)
rcu_assign_pointer(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table, ndst);
net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].hmask = nhashmask;
write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
synchronize_rcu();
@ -1245,7 +1244,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
} while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq));
spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
/* make sure that we can insert the indirect policies again before
* we start with destructive action.
@ -1354,7 +1353,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
out_unlock:
__xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(net);
write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
@ -2095,9 +2094,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
rcu_read_lock();
retry:
do {
sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
chain = policy_hash_direct(net, daddr, saddr, family, dir);
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
ret = NULL;
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pol, chain, bydst) {
@ -2128,7 +2127,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
}
skip_inexact:
if (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
if (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
goto retry;
if (ret && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(ret))
@ -4123,6 +4122,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(struct net *net)
/* Initialize the per-net locks here */
spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
seqcount_spinlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex);
rv = xfrm_statistics_init(net);
@ -4167,7 +4167,6 @@ void __init xfrm_init(void)
{
register_pernet_subsys(&xfrm_net_ops);
xfrm_dev_init();
seqcount_mutex_init(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &hash_resize_mutex);
xfrm_input_init();
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP