From f2ad37da805414e9385e7ca2961e1d0431df3799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:56:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] lib/fault-inject.c: use correct check for interrupts
in_interrupt() also returns true when bh is disabled in task context.
That's not what fail_task() wants to check. Use the new in_task()
predicate that does the right thing.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170321091805.140676-1-dvyukov@google.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/fault-inject.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
index 6a823a53e357..4ff157159a0d 100644
--- a/lib/fault-inject.c
+++ b/lib/fault-inject.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void fail_dump(struct fault_attr *attr)
static bool fail_task(struct fault_attr *attr, struct task_struct *task)
{
- return !in_interrupt() && task->make_it_fail;
+ return in_task() && task->make_it_fail;
}
#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH 32