scsi: target: Put lun_ref at end of tmr processing
Testing with Loopback I found that, after a Loopback LUN has executed a TMR, I can no longer unlink the LUN. The rm command hangs in transport_clear_lun_ref() at wait_for_completion(&lun->lun_shutdown_comp) The reason is, that transport_lun_remove_cmd() is not called at the end of target_tmr_work(). It seems, that in other fabrics this call happens implicitly when the fabric drivers call transport_generic_free_cmd() during their ->queue_tm_rsp(). Unfortunately Loopback seems to not comply to the common way of calling transport_generic_free_cmd() from ->queue_*(). Instead it calls transport_generic_free_cmd() from its ->check_stop_free() only. But the ->check_stop_free() is called by transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric() after it has reset the se_cmd->se_lun pointer. Therefore the following transport_generic_free_cmd() skips the transport_lun_remove_cmd(). So this patch re-adds the transport_lun_remove_cmd() at the end of target_tmr_work(), which was removed during commit2c9fa49e10
("scsi: target/core: Make ABORT and LUN RESET handling synchronous"). For fabrics using transport_generic_free_cmd() in the usual way the double call to transport_lun_remove_cmd() doesn't harm, as transport_lun_remove_cmd() checks for this situation and does not release lun_ref twice. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200513153443.3554-1-bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com Fixes:2c9fa49e10
("scsi: target/core: Make ABORT and LUN RESET handling synchronous") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryangly@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bart van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
05d18ae1cc
commit
f2e6b75f6e
@ -3350,6 +3350,7 @@ static void target_tmr_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
|
||||
cmd->se_tfo->queue_tm_rsp(cmd);
|
||||
|
||||
transport_lun_remove_cmd(cmd);
|
||||
transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric(cmd);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user