libfc: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()
The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers. According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment: "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer" it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a smaller overhead. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ @@ - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., NULL) Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8d23dc613
commit
f4303d8fa6
@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ void fc_fc4_deregister_provider(enum fc_fh_type type, struct fc4_prov *prov)
|
||||
BUG_ON(type >= FC_FC4_PROV_SIZE);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&fc_prov_mutex);
|
||||
if (prov->recv)
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(fc_passive_prov[type], NULL);
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(fc_passive_prov[type], NULL);
|
||||
else
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(fc_active_prov[type], NULL);
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(fc_active_prov[type], NULL);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&fc_prov_mutex);
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user