powerpc/32s: Make local symbols non visible in hash_low.
In hash_low.S, a lot of named local symbols are used instead of numbers to ease code readability. However, they don't need to be visible. In order to ease blacklisting of functions running with MMU disabled for kprobe, rename the symbols to .Lsymbols in order to hide them as if they were numbered labels. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/90c430d9e0f7af772a58aaeaf17bcc6321265340.1585670437.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr
This commit is contained in:
parent
a64371b5d4
commit
f892c21d2e
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ _GLOBAL(hash_page)
|
||||
rlwinm. r8,r8,0,0,20 /* extract pt base address */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
beq- hash_page_out /* return if no mapping */
|
||||
beq- .Lhash_page_out /* return if no mapping */
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/* XXX it seems like the 601 will give a machine fault on the
|
||||
rfi if its alignment is wrong (bottom 4 bits of address are
|
||||
@ -109,11 +109,11 @@ _GLOBAL(hash_page)
|
||||
#if (PTE_FLAGS_OFFSET != 0)
|
||||
addi r8,r8,PTE_FLAGS_OFFSET
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
.Lretry:
|
||||
lwarx r6,0,r8 /* get linux-style pte, flag word */
|
||||
andc. r5,r3,r6 /* check access & ~permission */
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
bne- hash_page_out /* return if access not permitted */
|
||||
bne- .Lhash_page_out /* return if access not permitted */
|
||||
#else
|
||||
bnelr-
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_PTE_64BIT */
|
||||
stwcx. r5,0,r8 /* attempt to update PTE */
|
||||
bne- retry /* retry if someone got there first */
|
||||
bne- .Lretry /* retry if someone got there first */
|
||||
|
||||
mfsrin r3,r4 /* get segment reg for segment */
|
||||
#ifndef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
|
||||
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
hash_page_out:
|
||||
.Lhash_page_out:
|
||||
eieio
|
||||
lis r8, (mmu_hash_lock - PAGE_OFFSET)@ha
|
||||
li r0,0
|
||||
@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT)
|
||||
1: LDPTEu r6,HPTE_SIZE(r4) /* get next PTE */
|
||||
CMPPTE 0,r6,r5
|
||||
bdnzf 2,1b /* loop while ctr != 0 && !cr0.eq */
|
||||
beq+ found_slot
|
||||
beq+ .Lfound_slot
|
||||
|
||||
patch_site 0f, patch__hash_page_B
|
||||
/* Search the secondary PTEG for a matching PTE */
|
||||
@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT)
|
||||
2: LDPTEu r6,HPTE_SIZE(r4)
|
||||
CMPPTE 0,r6,r5
|
||||
bdnzf 2,2b
|
||||
beq+ found_slot
|
||||
beq+ .Lfound_slot
|
||||
xori r5,r5,PTE_H /* clear H bit again */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Search the primary PTEG for an empty slot */
|
||||
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT)
|
||||
1: LDPTEu r6,HPTE_SIZE(r4) /* get next PTE */
|
||||
TST_V(r6) /* test valid bit */
|
||||
bdnzf 2,1b /* loop while ctr != 0 && !cr0.eq */
|
||||
beq+ found_empty
|
||||
beq+ .Lfound_empty
|
||||
|
||||
/* update counter of times that the primary PTEG is full */
|
||||
lis r4, (primary_pteg_full - PAGE_OFFSET)@ha
|
||||
@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT)
|
||||
2: LDPTEu r6,HPTE_SIZE(r4)
|
||||
TST_V(r6)
|
||||
bdnzf 2,2b
|
||||
beq+ found_empty
|
||||
beq+ .Lfound_empty
|
||||
xori r5,r5,PTE_H /* clear H bit again */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -437,9 +437,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/* Store PTE in PTEG */
|
||||
found_empty:
|
||||
.Lfound_empty:
|
||||
STPTE r5,0(r4)
|
||||
found_slot:
|
||||
.Lfound_slot:
|
||||
STPTE r8,HPTE_SIZE/2(r4)
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ found_slot:
|
||||
* We do however have to make sure that the PTE is never in an invalid
|
||||
* state with the V bit set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
found_empty:
|
||||
found_slot:
|
||||
.Lfound_empty:
|
||||
.Lfound_slot:
|
||||
CLR_V(r5,r0) /* clear V (valid) bit in PTE */
|
||||
STPTE r5,0(r4)
|
||||
sync
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user