iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

signal/pid_namespace: Fix reboot_pid_ns to use send_sig not force_sig

Browse Source 
The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
exits or execs (as sighand may change).  The is not a locking problem
in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
exceptions.

Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
delivery of the signal.  The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
delivered.

So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
and pointless.

Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.

Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Fixes: cf3f89214e ("pidns: add reboot_pid_ns() to handle the reboot syscall")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric W. Biederman 2019-05-15 12:29:52 -05:00
parent 1dfd1711de
commit f9070dc945
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
kernel/pid_namespace.c
View File

@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int reboot_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int cmd)
}
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
force_sig(SIGKILL, pid_ns->child_reaper);
send_sig(SIGKILL, pid_ns->child_reaper, 1);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
do_exit(0);