From f980f13e4eb299abba6692365315196e1ba6fd2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Thaler Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 08:33:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] bpf, docs: Clarify call local offset In the Jump instructions section it explains that the offset is "relative to the instruction following the jump instruction". But the program-local section confusingly said "referenced by offset from the call instruction, similar to JA". This patch updates that sentence with consistent wording, saying it's relative to the instruction following the call instruction. Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240525153332.21355-1-dthaler1968@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst index 1602454fe7cf..08f614b10a56 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst @@ -552,9 +552,10 @@ is outside the scope of this document and is left for future work. Program-local functions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Program-local functions are functions exposed by the same BPF program as the -caller, and are referenced by offset from the call instruction, similar to -``JA``. The offset is encoded in the 'imm' field of the call instruction. -An ``EXIT`` within the program-local function will return to the caller. +caller, and are referenced by offset from the instruction following the call +instruction, similar to ``JA``. The offset is encoded in the 'imm' field of +the call instruction. An ``EXIT`` within the program-local function will +return to the caller. Load and store instructions ===========================