pstore: Switch pmsg_lock to an rt_mutex to avoid priority inversion
[ Upstream commit 76d62f24db07f22ccf9bc18ca793c27d4ebef721 ] Wei Wang reported seeing priority inversion caused latencies caused by contention on pmsg_lock, and suggested it be switched to a rt_mutex. I was initially hesitant this would help, as the tasks in that trace all seemed to be SCHED_NORMAL, so the benefit would be limited to only nice boosting. However, another similar issue was raised where the priority inversion was seen did involve a blocked RT task so it is clear this would be helpful in that case. Cc: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com> Cc: Midas Chien<midaschieh@google.com> Cc: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Fixes: 9d5438f462ab ("pstore: Add pmsg - user-space accessible pstore object") Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221214231834.3711880-1-jstultz@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ddfd1d5dd
commit
f9e761541e
@ -15,9 +15,10 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/device.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/fs.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
|
||||
#include "internal.h"
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
|
||||
static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
|
||||
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
|
||||
@ -36,9 +37,9 @@ static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
|
||||
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, buf, count))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
|
||||
rt_mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
|
||||
ret = psinfo->write_user(&record, buf);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
|
||||
rt_mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
|
||||
return ret ? ret : count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user