sched: Fix fork vs hotplug vs cpuset namespaces
There are a number of issues: 1) TASK_WAKING vs cgroup_clone (cpusets) copy_process(): sched_fork() child->state = TASK_WAKING; /* waiting for wake_up_new_task() */ if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy) ns_cgroup_clone() cgroup_clone() mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex) mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex) cgroup_attach_task() ss->can_attach() ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ] cpuset_attach_task() set_cpus_allowed_ptr(); while (child->state == TASK_WAKING) cpu_relax(); will deadlock the system. 2) cgroup_clone (cpusets) vs copy_process So even if the above would work we still have: copy_process(): if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy) ns_cgroup_clone() cgroup_clone() mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex) mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex) cgroup_attach_task() ss->can_attach() ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ] cpuset_attach_task() set_cpus_allowed_ptr(); ... p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed over-writing the modified cpus_allowed. 3) fork() vs hotplug if we unplug the child's cpu after the sanity check when the child gets attached to the task_list but before wake_up_new_task() shit will meet with fan. Solve all these issues by moving fork cpu selection into wake_up_new_task(). Reported-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Tested-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1264106190.4283.1314.camel@laptop> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d558c3ac9
commit
fabf318e5e
@ -1241,21 +1241,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
|
||||
/* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling! */
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The task hasn't been attached yet, so its cpus_allowed mask will
|
||||
* not be changed, nor will its assigned CPU.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The cpus_allowed mask of the parent may have changed after it was
|
||||
* copied first time - so re-copy it here, then check the child's CPU
|
||||
* to ensure it is on a valid CPU (and if not, just force it back to
|
||||
* parent's CPU). This avoids alot of nasty races.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
|
||||
p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = current->rt.nr_cpus_allowed;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_allowed) ||
|
||||
!cpu_online(task_cpu(p))))
|
||||
set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
|
||||
|
||||
/* CLONE_PARENT re-uses the old parent */
|
||||
if (clone_flags & (CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_THREAD)) {
|
||||
p->real_parent = current->real_parent;
|
||||
|
@ -2320,14 +2320,12 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Called from:
|
||||
* Gets called from 3 sites (exec, fork, wakeup), since it is called without
|
||||
* holding rq->lock we need to ensure ->cpus_allowed is stable, this is done
|
||||
* by:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - fork, @p is stable because it isn't on the tasklist yet
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - exec, @p is unstable, retry loop
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - wake-up, we serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING so
|
||||
* we should be good.
|
||||
* exec: is unstable, retry loop
|
||||
* fork & wake-up: serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline
|
||||
int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags)
|
||||
@ -2620,9 +2618,6 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
|
||||
if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
|
||||
p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
|
||||
@ -2652,6 +2647,21 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct rq *rq;
|
||||
int cpu = get_cpu();
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fork balancing, do it here and not earlier because:
|
||||
* - cpus_allowed can change in the fork path
|
||||
* - any previously selected cpu might disappear through hotplug
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We still have TASK_WAKING but PF_STARTING is gone now, meaning
|
||||
* ->cpus_allowed is stable, we have preemption disabled, meaning
|
||||
* cpu_online_mask is stable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
|
||||
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
|
||||
BUG_ON(p->state != TASK_WAKING);
|
||||
@ -2665,6 +2675,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
|
||||
p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
|
||||
put_cpu();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
|
||||
@ -7139,14 +7150,18 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
|
||||
* the ->cpus_allowed mask from under waking tasks, which would be
|
||||
* possible when we change rq->lock in ttwu(), so synchronize against
|
||||
* TASK_WAKING to avoid that.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Make an exception for freshly cloned tasks, since cpuset namespaces
|
||||
* might move the task about, we have to validate the target in
|
||||
* wake_up_new_task() anyway since the cpu might have gone away.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
again:
|
||||
while (p->state == TASK_WAKING)
|
||||
while (p->state == TASK_WAKING && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING))
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
|
||||
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (p->state == TASK_WAKING) {
|
||||
if (p->state == TASK_WAKING && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)) {
|
||||
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user