mm: vmalloc: fix lockdep warning
A lockdep reports a possible deadlock in the find_vmap_area_exceed_addr_lock() function: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.9.0-rc1-00060-ged3ccc57b108-dirty #6140 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- drgn/455 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000c00131d0 (&vn->busy.lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: find_vmap_area_exceed_addr_lock+0x64/0x124 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000c0011878 (&vn->busy.lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: find_vmap_area_exceed_addr_lock+0x64/0x124 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&vn->busy.lock/1); lock(&vn->busy.lock/1); *** DEADLOCK *** indeed it can happen if the find_vmap_area_exceed_addr_lock() gets called concurrently because it tries to acquire two nodes locks. It was done to prevent removing a lowest VA found on a previous step. To address this a lowest VA is found first without holding a node lock where it resides. As a last step we check if a VA still there because it can go away, if removed, proceed with next lowest. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment typos, per Baoquan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240328140330.4747-1-urezki@gmail.com Fixes: 53becf32aec1 ("mm: vmalloc: support multiple nodes in vread_iter") Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Tested-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4ed91fa917
commit
fc2c22693c
71
mm/vmalloc.c
71
mm/vmalloc.c
@ -989,6 +989,27 @@ unsigned long vmalloc_nr_pages(void)
|
||||
return atomic_long_read(&nr_vmalloc_pages);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr, struct rb_root *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_node *n = root->rb_node;
|
||||
|
||||
addr = (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)addr);
|
||||
|
||||
while (n) {
|
||||
struct vmap_area *va;
|
||||
|
||||
va = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
|
||||
if (addr < va->va_start)
|
||||
n = n->rb_left;
|
||||
else if (addr >= va->va_end)
|
||||
n = n->rb_right;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return va;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Look up the first VA which satisfies addr < va_end, NULL if none. */
|
||||
static struct vmap_area *
|
||||
__find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(unsigned long addr, struct rb_root *root)
|
||||
@ -1025,47 +1046,39 @@ __find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(unsigned long addr, struct rb_root *root)
|
||||
static struct vmap_node *
|
||||
find_vmap_area_exceed_addr_lock(unsigned long addr, struct vmap_area **va)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vmap_node *vn, *va_node = NULL;
|
||||
struct vmap_area *va_lowest;
|
||||
unsigned long va_start_lowest;
|
||||
struct vmap_node *vn;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < nr_vmap_nodes; i++) {
|
||||
repeat:
|
||||
for (i = 0, va_start_lowest = 0; i < nr_vmap_nodes; i++) {
|
||||
vn = &vmap_nodes[i];
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&vn->busy.lock);
|
||||
va_lowest = __find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(addr, &vn->busy.root);
|
||||
if (va_lowest) {
|
||||
if (!va_node || va_lowest->va_start < (*va)->va_start) {
|
||||
if (va_node)
|
||||
spin_unlock(&va_node->busy.lock);
|
||||
*va = __find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(addr, &vn->busy.root);
|
||||
|
||||
*va = va_lowest;
|
||||
va_node = vn;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (*va)
|
||||
if (!va_start_lowest || (*va)->va_start < va_start_lowest)
|
||||
va_start_lowest = (*va)->va_start;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&vn->busy.lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return va_node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if found VA exists, it might have gone away. In this case we
|
||||
* repeat the search because a VA has been removed concurrently and we
|
||||
* need to proceed to the next one, which is a rare case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (va_start_lowest) {
|
||||
vn = addr_to_node(va_start_lowest);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr, struct rb_root *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_node *n = root->rb_node;
|
||||
spin_lock(&vn->busy.lock);
|
||||
*va = __find_vmap_area(va_start_lowest, &vn->busy.root);
|
||||
|
||||
addr = (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)addr);
|
||||
if (*va)
|
||||
return vn;
|
||||
|
||||
while (n) {
|
||||
struct vmap_area *va;
|
||||
|
||||
va = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
|
||||
if (addr < va->va_start)
|
||||
n = n->rb_left;
|
||||
else if (addr >= va->va_end)
|
||||
n = n->rb_right;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return va;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&vn->busy.lock);
|
||||
goto repeat;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user