From fc3293a80acc469fbabc91bfbf2e65dc84377dc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Theodore Ts'o Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:27:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode commit 0a944e8a6c66ca04c7afbaa17e22bf208a8b37f0 upstream. Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger a failure. This was causing failures like this: [ 53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode #8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0) [ 53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8 [ 53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8. ... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the extent cache. (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.) Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") Reported-by: Dan Rue Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju Signed-off-by: Ashwin H Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 34b79825efdc..4f9eb4b61549 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -554,10 +554,14 @@ __read_extent_tree_block(const char *function, unsigned int line, } if (buffer_verified(bh) && !(flags & EXT4_EX_FORCE_CACHE)) return bh; - err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode, - ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk); - if (err) - goto errout; + if (!ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) || + (inode->i_ino != + le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum))) { + err = __ext4_ext_check(function, line, inode, + ext_block_hdr(bh), depth, pblk); + if (err) + goto errout; + } set_buffer_verified(bh); /* * If this is a leaf block, cache all of its entries