drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Poll for DP PLL Lock
Instead of just waiting and hoping, actually poll for the pll lock to be acquired. As a bonus, this should be significantly faster than the sleep. Changes in v3: - Added to the set Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Sandeep Panda <spanda@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180813213058.184821-6-sean@poorly.run
This commit is contained in:
parent
73c89ead71
commit
fc52d0ed11
@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
|
||||
unsigned int val;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* DSI_A lane config */
|
||||
val = CHA_DSI_LANES(4 - pdata->dsi->lanes);
|
||||
@ -472,7 +473,14 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
|
||||
|
||||
/* enable DP PLL */
|
||||
regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PLL_ENABLE_REG, 1);
|
||||
usleep_range(10000, 10500); /* 10ms delay recommended by spec */
|
||||
|
||||
ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pdata->regmap, SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG, val,
|
||||
val & DPPLL_SRC_DP_PLL_LOCK, 1000,
|
||||
50 * 1000);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("DP_PLL_LOCK polling failed (%d)\n", ret);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The SN65DSI86 only supports ASSR Display Authentication method and
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user