perf: Various spelling fixes

Fix various spelling errors as reported by Debian's lintian tool.

"amount of times" -> "number of times"
ocurrence -> occurrence
upto -> up to

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230122122034.48020-1-didi.debian@cknow.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Diederik de Haas 2023-01-22 13:20:32 +01:00 committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent 7158005b4e
commit fc5d836c67
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ COMMON OPTIONS
-------------- --------------
-r:: -r::
--repeat=:: --repeat=::
Specify amount of times to repeat the run (default 10). Specify number of times to repeat the run (default 10).
-f:: -f::
--format=:: --format=::

View File

@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ unsigned int bench_repeat = 10; /* default number of times to repeat the run */
static const struct option bench_options[] = { static const struct option bench_options[] = {
OPT_STRING('f', "format", &bench_format_str, "default|simple", "Specify the output formatting style"), OPT_STRING('f', "format", &bench_format_str, "default|simple", "Specify the output formatting style"),
OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &bench_repeat, "Specify amount of times to repeat the run"), OPT_UINTEGER('r', "repeat", &bench_repeat, "Specify number of times to repeat the run"),
OPT_END() OPT_END()
}; };

View File

@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
goto out; goto out;
/* /*
* Print final block upto sample * Print final block up to sample
* *
* Due to pipeline delays the LBRs might be missing a branch * Due to pipeline delays the LBRs might be missing a branch
* or two, which can result in very large or negative blocks * or two, which can result in very large or negative blocks

View File

@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ bool evswitch__discard(struct evswitch *evswitch, struct evsel *evsel);
#define OPTS_EVSWITCH(evswitch) \ #define OPTS_EVSWITCH(evswitch) \
OPT_STRING(0, "switch-on", &(evswitch)->on_name, \ OPT_STRING(0, "switch-on", &(evswitch)->on_name, \
"event", "Consider events after the ocurrence of this event"), \ "event", "Consider events after the occurrence of this event"), \
OPT_STRING(0, "switch-off", &(evswitch)->off_name, \ OPT_STRING(0, "switch-off", &(evswitch)->off_name, \
"event", "Stop considering events after the ocurrence of this event"), \ "event", "Stop considering events after the occurrence of this event"), \
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-on-off-events", &(evswitch)->show_on_off_events, \ OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-on-off-events", &(evswitch)->show_on_off_events, \
"Show the on/off switch events, used with --switch-on and --switch-off") "Show the on/off switch events, used with --switch-on and --switch-off")