IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports for lib/*kunit:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/bitfield_kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/checksum_kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/cmdline_kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/is_signed_type_kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/overflow_kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/stackinit_kunit.o
Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240601-md-lib-kunit-tests-v1-1-4493fe0032b9@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When a flexible array structure has a __counted_by annotation, its use
with DEFINE_RAW_FLEX() will result in the count being zero-initialized.
This is expected since one doesn't want to use RAW with a counted_by
struct. Adjust the tests to check for the condition and for compiler
support.
Reported-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0bfc6b38-8bc5-4971-b6fb-dc642a73fbfe@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610182301.work.272-kees@kernel.org
Tested-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
The norm should be flexible array structures with __counted_by
annotations, so DEFINE_FLEX() is updated to expect that. Rename
the non-annotated version to DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(), and update the
few existing users. Additionally add selftests for the macros.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306235128.it.933-kees@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This allows replacements of the idioms "var += offset" and "var -=
offset" with the wrapping_assign_add() and wrapping_assign_sub() helpers
respectively. They will avoid wrap-around sanitizer instrumentation.
Add to the selftests to validate behavior and lack of side-effects.
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Provide helpers that will perform wrapping addition, subtraction, or
multiplication without tripping the arithmetic wrap-around sanitizers. The
first argument is the type under which the wrap-around should happen
with. In other words, these two calls will get very different results:
wrapping_mul(int, 50, 50) == 2500
wrapping_mul(u8, 50, 50) == 196
Add to the selftests to validate behavior and lack of side-effects.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Using struct root_device to create fake devices for tests is something
of a hack. The new struct kunit_device is meant for this purpose, so use
it instead.
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
While struct_size() is normally used in situations where the structure
type already has a pointer instance, there are places where no variable
is available. In the past, this has been worked around by using a typed
NULL first argument, but this is a bit ugly. Add a helper to do this,
and replace the handful of instances of the code pattern with it.
Instances were found with this Coccinelle script:
@struct_size_t@
identifier STRUCT, MEMBER;
expression COUNT;
@@
- struct_size((struct STRUCT *)\(0\|NULL\),
+ struct_size_t(struct STRUCT,
MEMBER, COUNT)
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
Cc: Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com
Cc: storagedev@microchip.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522211810.never.421-kees@kernel.org
Implement a robust overflows_type() macro to test if a variable or
constant value would overflow another variable or type. This can be
used as a constant expression for static_assert() (which requires a
constant expression[1][2]) when used on constant values. This must be
constructed manually, since __builtin_add_overflow() does not produce
a constant expression[3].
Additionally adds castable_to_type(), similar to __same_type(), but for
checking if a constant value would overflow if cast to a given type.
Add unit tests for overflows_type(), __same_type(), and castable_to_type()
to the existing KUnit "overflow" test:
[16:03:33] ================== overflow (21 subtests) ==================
...
[16:03:33] [PASSED] overflows_type_test
[16:03:33] [PASSED] same_type_test
[16:03:33] [PASSED] castable_to_type_test
[16:03:33] ==================== [PASSED] overflow =====================
[16:03:33] ============================================================
[16:03:33] Testing complete. Ran 21 tests: passed: 21
[16:03:33] Elapsed time: 24.022s total, 0.002s configuring, 22.598s building, 0.767s running
[1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/_Static_assert
[2] C11 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2011): 6.7.10 Static assertions
[3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Integer-Overflow-Builtins.html
6.56 Built-in Functions to Perform Arithmetic with Overflow Checking
Built-in Function: bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b,
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Co-developed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221024201125.1416422-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Convert test exclusion into test skipping. This brings the logic for
why a test is being skipped into the test itself, instead of having to
spread ifdefs around the code. This will make cleanup easier as minimum
tests get raised. Drop __maybe_unused so missed tests will be noticed
again and clean up whitespace.
For example, clang-11 on i386:
[15:52:32] ================== overflow (18 subtests) ==================
[15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__u8_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] s8_s8__s8_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] u16_u16__u16_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] s16_s16__s16_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u32_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] s32_s32__s32_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u64_u64__u64_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [SKIPPED] s64_s64__s64_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u32_u32__int_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u8_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__int_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] int_int__u8_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_sane_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_overflow_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_truncate_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_nonsense_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_allocation_test
[15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_size_helpers_test
[15:52:32] ==================== [PASSED] overflow =====================
[15:52:32] ============================================================
[15:52:32] Testing complete. Ran 18 tests: passed: 15, skipped: 3
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006230017.1833458-1-keescook@chromium.org
Building the overflow kunit tests with clang-11 fails with:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=arm --make_options LLVM=1 \
overflow
...
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __mulodi4
...
Clang 11 and earlier generate unwanted libcalls for signed output,
unsigned input.
Disable these tests for now, but should these become used in the kernel
we might consider that as justification for dropping clang-11 support.
Keep the clang-11 build alive a little bit longer.
Avoid -Wunused-function warnings via __maybe_unused. To test W=1:
$ make LLVM=1 -j128 defconfig
$ ./scripts/config -e KUNIT -e KUNIT_ALL
$ make LLVM=1 -j128 olddefconfig lib/overflow_kunit.o W=1
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1711
Link: 3203143f13
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006171751.3444575-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
This KUnit update for Linux 6.1-rc1 consists of several documentation
fixes, UML related cleanups, and a feature to enable/disable KUnit
tests. This update includes the following change to
- rename all_test_uml.config, use it for --alltests
Note: if anyone was using all_tests_uml.config, this change breaks them.
This change simplifies the usage and eliminates the need to type:
--kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests_uml.config.
A simple workaround to create a symlink to the new name can solve the
problem for anyone using all_tests_uml.config.
all_tests_uml.config should work across ~all architectures.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Q5W1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
"Several documentation fixes, UML related cleanups, and a feature to
enable/disable KUnit tests
This includes the change to rename all_test_uml.config, and use it for
'--alltests'. Note: if anyone was using all_tests_uml.config, this
change breaks them.
This change simplifies the usage and eliminates the need to type:
--kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests_uml.config
A simple workaround to create a symlink to the new name can solve the
problem for anyone using all_tests_uml.config.
all_tests_uml.config should work across ~all architectures"
* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
Documentation: Kunit: Use full path to .kunitconfig
kunit: tool: rename all_test_uml.config, use it for --alltests
kunit: tool: remove UML specific options from all_tests_uml.config
lib: stackinit: update reference to kunit-tool
lib: overflow: update reference to kunit-tool
Documentation: KUnit: update links in the index page
Documentation: KUnit: add intro to the getting-started page
Documentation: KUnit: Reword start guide for selecting tests
Documentation: KUnit: add note about mrproper in start.rst
Documentation: KUnit: avoid repeating "kunit.py run" in start.rst
Documentation: KUnit: remove duplicated docs for kunit_tool
Documentation: Kunit: Add ref for other kinds of tests
Documentation: KUnit: Fix non-uml anchor
Documentation: Kunit: Fix inconsistent titles
Documentation: kunit: fix trivial typo
kunit: no longer call module_info(test, "Y") for kunit modules
kunit: add kunit.enable to enable/disable KUnit test
kunit: tool: make --raw_output=kunit (aka --raw_output) preserve leading spaces
Replace URL with an updated path to the full Documentation page
Signed-off-by: Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests
create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this,
separating by rough shift overflow cases.
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments
were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler.
However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine
to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful,
as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two
large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2].
Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise
some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental
macro side-effects.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
The 64-bit overflow tests will trigger 64-bit division on 32-bit hosts,
which is not currently used anywhere in the kernel, and tickles bugs
in at least Clang 13 and earlier:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1636
In reality, there shouldn't be a reason to not build the 64-bit test
cases on 32-bit systems, so these #ifdefs can be removed once the minimum
Clang version reaches 13.
In the meantime, silence W=1 warnings given by the current code:
../lib/overflow_kunit.c:191:19: warning: 's64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
191 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s64) = {
| ^~~
../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY'
24 | } t ## _tests[]
| ^
../lib/overflow_kunit.c:94:19: warning: 'u64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
94 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u64) = {
| ^~~
../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY'
24 | } t ## _tests[]
| ^
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202205110324.7GrtxG8u-lkp@intel.com
Fixes: 455a35a6cd ("lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions")
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGS_qxokQAjQRip2vPi80toW7hmBnXf=KMTNT51B1wuDqSZuVQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
