IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all
includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make
install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted.
To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been
changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that.
Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
Now that binutils and gcc support for BPF is upstream, make use of it in
BPF selftests using alu32-like approach. Share as much as possible of
CFLAGS calculation with clang.
Fixes only obvious issues, leaving more complex ones for later:
- Use gcc-provided bpf-helpers.h instead of manually defining the
helpers, change bpf_helpers.h include guard to avoid conflict.
- Include <linux/stddef.h> for __always_inline.
- Add $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include to include path in order to use local
kernel headers instead of system kernel headers when building with O=.
In order to activate the bpf-gcc support, one needs to configure
binutils and gcc with --target=bpf and make them available in $PATH. In
particular, gcc must be installed as `bpf-gcc`, which is the default.
Right now with binutils 25a2915e8dba and gcc r275589 only a handful of
tests work:
# ./test_progs_bpf_gcc
# Summary: 7/39 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 98 FAILED
The reason for those failures are as follows:
- Build errors:
- `error: too many function arguments for eBPF` for __always_inline
functions read_str_var and read_map_var - must be inlining issue,
and for process_l3_headers_v6, which relies on optimizing away
function arguments.
- `error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF`
where there are no obvious indirect calls in the source calls, e.g.
in __encap_ipip_none.
- `error: field 'lock' has incomplete type` for fields of `struct
bpf_spin_lock` type - bpf_spin_lock is re#defined by bpf-helpers.h,
so its usage is sensitive to order of #includes.
- `error: eBPF stack limit exceeded` in sysctl_tcp_mem.
- Load errors:
- Missing object files due to above build errors.
- `libbpf: failed to create map (name: 'test_ver.bss')`.
- `libbpf: object file doesn't contain bpf program`.
- `libbpf: Program '.text' contains unrecognized relo data pointing to
section 0`.
- `libbpf: BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted` - no BTF
support in gcc yet.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a small test that shows how to shape a TCP flow in tc-bpf
with EDT and ECN.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
