IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We observed a corruption during on-line resize of a file system that is
larger than 16 TiB with 4k block size. With having more then 2^32 blocks
resize_inode is turned off by default by mke2fs. The issue can be
reproduced on a smaller file system for convenience by explicitly
turning off resize_inode. An on-line resize across an 8 GiB boundary (the
size of a meta block group in this setup) then leads to a corruption:
dev=/dev/<some_dev> # should be >= 16 GiB
mkdir -p /corruption
/sbin/mke2fs -t ext4 -b 4096 -O ^resize_inode $dev $((2 * 2**21 - 2**15))
mount -t ext4 $dev /corruption
dd if=/dev/zero bs=4096 of=/corruption/test count=$((2*2**21 - 4*2**15))
sha1sum /corruption/test
# 79d2658b39dcfd77274e435b0934028adafaab11 /corruption/test
/sbin/resize2fs $dev $((2*2**21))
# drop page cache to force reload the block from disk
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
sha1sum /corruption/test
# 3c2abc63cbf1a94c9e6977e0fbd72cd832c4d5c3 /corruption/test
2^21 = 2^15*2^6 equals 8 GiB whereof 2^15 is the number of blocks per
block group and 2^6 are the number of block groups that make a meta
block group.
The last checksum might be different depending on how the file is laid
out across the physical blocks. The actual corruption occurs at physical
block 63*2^15 = 2064384 which would be the location of the backup of the
meta block group's block descriptor. During the on-line resize the file
system will be converted to meta_bg starting at s_first_meta_bg which is
2 in the example - meaning all block groups after 16 GiB. However, in
ext4_flex_group_add we might add block groups that are not part of the
first meta block group yet. In the reproducer we achieved this by
substracting the size of a whole block group from the point where the
meta block group would start. This must be considered when updating the
backup block group descriptors to follow the non-meta_bg layout. The fix
is to add a test whether the group to add is already part of the meta
block group or not.
Fixes: 01f795f9e0 ("ext4: add online resizing support for meta_bg and 64-bit file systems")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Srivathsa Dara <srivathsa.d.dara@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivathsa Dara <srivathsa.d.dara@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215155009.94493-1-mheyne@amazon.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When a large flex_bg file system is resized, the number of groups to be
added may be small, and a large amount of memory that will not be used will
be allocated. Therefore, resize_bg can be set to the size after the number
of new_group_data to be used is aligned upwards to the power of 2. This
does not affect the disk layout after online resize and saves some memory.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When we online resize an ext4 filesystem with a oversized flexbg_size,
mkfs.ext4 -F -G 67108864 $dev -b 4096 100M
mount $dev $dir
resize2fs $dev 16G
the following WARN_ON is triggered:
==================================================================
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 427 at mm/page_alloc.c:4402 __alloc_pages+0x411/0x550
Modules linked in: sg(E)
CPU: 0 PID: 427 Comm: resize2fs Tainted: G E 6.6.0-rc5+ #314
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x411/0x550
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__kmalloc_large_node+0xa2/0x200
__kmalloc+0x16e/0x290
ext4_resize_fs+0x481/0xd80
__ext4_ioctl+0x1616/0x1d90
ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x150
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
==================================================================
This is because flexbg_size is too large and the size of the new_group_data
array to be allocated exceeds MAX_ORDER. Currently, the minimum value of
MAX_ORDER is 8, the minimum value of PAGE_SIZE is 4096, the corresponding
maximum number of groups that can be allocated is:
(PAGE_SIZE << MAX_ORDER) / sizeof(struct ext4_new_group_data) ≈ 21845
And the value that is down-aligned to the power of 2 is 16384. Therefore,
this value is defined as MAX_RESIZE_BG, and the number of groups added
each time does not exceed this value during resizing, and is added multiple
times to complete the online resizing. The difference is that the metadata
in a flex_bg may be more dispersed.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In commit 967ac8af44 ("ext4: fix potential integer overflow in
alloc_flex_gd()"), an overflow check is added to alloc_flex_gd() to
prevent the allocated memory from being smaller than expected due to
the overflow. However, after kmalloc() is replaced with kmalloc_array()
in commit 6da2ec5605 ("treewide: kmalloc() -> kmalloc_array()"), the
kmalloc_array() function has an overflow check, so the above problem
will not occur. Therefore, the extra check is removed.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The maximum value of flexbg_size is 2^31, but the maximum value of int
is (2^31 - 1), so overflow may occur when the type of flexbg_size is
declared as int.
For example, when uninit_mask is initialized in ext4_alloc_group_tables(),
if flexbg_size == 2^31, the initialized uninit_mask is incorrect, and this
may causes set_flexbg_block_bitmap() to trigger a BUG_ON().
Therefore, the flexbg_size type is declared as unsigned int to avoid
overflow and memory waste.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We always overwrite count2 to "EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) -
(first_cluster - start)" after its initialization in for loop
initialization statement .
Just remove unnecessary initialization of count2.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-14-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The sbi->s_group_desc contains array of bh's for block group descriptors
and continuous EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) bg descriptors in single block
share the same bh.
Simply call update_backups for each gdb_bh in sbi->s_group_desc will not
update same group descriptors block for multiple times.
Commit 0acdb8876f ("ext4: don't call update_backups() multiple times for
the same bg") wrongly assumed each block group descriptor in the same block
has a individual bh and unnecessary check was added.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-13-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We always call add_new_gdb_meta_bg with first group in mete_bg. Remove the
unnecessary ext4_meta_bg_first_group conversion to simplify the gdbblock
calculation.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We save EXT4_SB(sb) to local variable sbi at beginning of function
ext4_resize_begin. Use sbi directly instead of EXT4_SB(sb) to
remove unnecessary pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove EXT4FS_DEBUG defination in resize.c for following reasons:
1. EXT4FS_DEBUG will enable debug messages, it should only be defined
when debugging.
2. ext4.h included from ext4_jbd2.h after EXT4FS_DEBUG defination will
"#undef EXT4FS_DEBUG", then EXT4FS_DEBUG defination in resize.c can't
actually turn on ext4_debug messages.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The field free_cluster_count in struct ext4_new_group_data should be
in units of clusters. In verify_group_input() this field is being
filled in units of blocks. Fortunately, we don't support online
resizing of bigalloc file systems, and for non-bigalloc file systems,
the cluster size == block size. But fix this in case we do support
online resizing of bigalloc file systems in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Wrong check of gdb backup in meta bg as following:
first_group is the first group of meta_bg which contains target group, so
target group is always >= first_group. We check if target group has gdb
backup by comparing first_group with [group + 1] and [group +
EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1]. As group >= first_group, then [group + N] is
> first_group. So no copy of gdb backup in meta bg is done in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
No need to do gdb backup copy in meta bg from setup_new_flex_group_blocks
as we always copy updated gdb block to backups at end of
ext4_flex_group_add as following:
ext4_flex_group_add
/* no gdb backup copy for meta bg any more */
setup_new_flex_group_blocks
/* update current group number */
ext4_update_super
sbi->s_groups_count += flex_gd->count;
/*
* if group in meta bg contains backup is added, the primary gdb block
* of the meta bg will be copy to backup in new added group here.
*/
for (; gdb_num <= gdb_num_end; gdb_num++)
update_backups(...)
In summary, we can remove wrong gdb backup copy code in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Commit 0aeaa2559d ("ext4: fix corruption when online resizing a 1K
bigalloc fs") found that primary superblock's offset in its group is
not equal to offset of backup superblock in its group when block size
is 1K and bigalloc is enabled. As group descriptor blocks are right
after superblock, we can't pass block number of gdb to update_backups
for the same reason.
The root casue of the issue above is that leading 1K padding block is
count as data block offset for primary block while backup block has no
padding block offset in its group.
Remove padding data block count to fix the issue for gdb backups.
For meta_bg case, update_backups treat blk_off as block number, do no
conversion in this case.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set. After this,
group parameter in ext4_set_bitmap_checksums is also not used, just
remove it too.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When a backup superblock is updated in update_backups(), the primary
superblock's offset in the group (that is, sbi->s_sbh->b_blocknr) is used
as the backup superblock's offset in its group. However, when the block
size is 1K and bigalloc is enabled, the two offsets are not equal. This
causes the backup group descriptors to be overwritten by the superblock
in update_backups(). Moreover, if meta_bg is enabled, the file system will
be corrupted because this feature uses backup group descriptors.
To solve this issue, we use a more accurate ext4_group_first_block_no() as
the offset of the backup superblock in its group.
Fixes: d77147ff44 ("ext4: add support for online resizing with bigalloc")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117040341.1380702-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In commit 9a8c5b0d06 ("ext4: update the backup superblock's at the end
of the online resize"), it is assumed that update_backups() only updates
backup superblocks, so each b_data is treated as a backupsuper block to
update its s_block_group_nr and s_checksum. However, update_backups()
also updates the backup group descriptors, which causes the backup group
descriptors to be corrupted.
The above commit fixes the problem of invalid checksum of the backup
superblock. The root cause of this problem is that the checksum of
ext4_update_super() is not set correctly. This problem has been fixed
in the previous patch ("ext4: fix bad checksum after online resize").
However, we do need to set block_group_nr for the backup superblock in
update_backups(). When a block is in a group that contains a backup
superblock, and the block is the first block in the group, the block is
definitely a superblock. We add a helper function that includes setting
s_block_group_nr and updating checksum, and then call it only when the
above conditions are met to prevent the backup group descriptors from
being incorrectly modified.
Fixes: 9a8c5b0d06 ("ext4: update the backup superblock's at the end of the online resize")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117040341.1380702-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When online resizing is performed twice consecutively, the error message
"Superblock checksum does not match superblock" is displayed for the
second time. Here's the reproducer:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdb 100M
mount /dev/sdb /tmp/test
resize2fs /dev/sdb 5G
resize2fs /dev/sdb 6G
To solve this issue, we moved the update of the checksum after the
es->s_overhead_clusters is updated.
Fixes: 026d0d27c4 ("ext4: reduce computation of overhead during resize")
Fixes: de394a8665 ("ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117040341.1380702-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return value directly from ext4_group_extend_no_check()
instead of getting value from redundant variable err.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831160843.305836-1-cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When expanding a file system using online resize, various fields in
the superblock (e.g., s_blocks_count, s_inodes_count, etc.) change.
To update the backup superblocks, the online resize uses the function
update_backups() in fs/ext4/resize.c. This function was not updating
the checksum field in the backup superblocks. This wasn't a big deal
previously, because e2fsck didn't care about the checksum field in the
backup superblock. (And indeed, update_backups() goes all the way
back to the ext3 days, well before we had support for metadata
checksums.)
However, there is an alternate, more general way of updating
superblock fields, ext4_update_primary_sb() in fs/ext4/ioctl.c. This
function does check the checksum of the backup superblock, and if it
doesn't match will mark the file system as corrupted. That was
clearly not the intent, so avoid to aborting the resize when a bad
superblock is found.
In addition, teach update_backups() to properly update the checksum in
the backup superblocks. We will eventually want to unify
updapte_backups() with the infrasture in ext4_update_primary_sb(), but
that's for another day.
Note: The problem has been around for a while; it just didn't really
matter until ext4_update_primary_sb() was added by commit bbc605cdb1
("ext4: implement support for get/set fs label"). And it became
trivially easy to reproduce after commit 827891a38a ("ext4: update
the s_overhead_clusters in the backup sb's when resizing") in v6.0.
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 5.17+
Fixes: bbc605cdb1 ("ext4: implement support for get/set fs label")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When expanding a file system from (16TiB-2MiB) to 18TiB, the operation
exits early which leads to result inconsistency between resize2fs and
Ext4 kernel driver.
=== before ===
○ → resize2fs /dev/mapper/thin
resize2fs 1.45.5 (07-Jan-2020)
Filesystem at /dev/mapper/thin is mounted on /mnt/test; on-line resizing required
old_desc_blocks = 2048, new_desc_blocks = 2304
The filesystem on /dev/mapper/thin is now 4831837696 (4k) blocks long.
[ 865.186308] EXT4-fs (dm-5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null). Quota mode: none.
[ 912.091502] dm-4: detected capacity change from 34359738368 to 38654705664
[ 970.030550] dm-5: detected capacity change from 34359734272 to 38654701568
[ 1000.012751] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 4294966784 to 4831837696 blocks
[ 1000.012878] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resized filesystem to 4294967296
=== after ===
[ 129.104898] EXT4-fs (dm-5): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null). Quota mode: none.
[ 143.773630] dm-4: detected capacity change from 34359738368 to 38654705664
[ 198.203246] dm-5: detected capacity change from 34359734272 to 38654701568
[ 207.918603] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 4294966784 to 4831837696 blocks
[ 207.918754] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 4294967296 to 4831837696 blocks
[ 207.918758] EXT4-fs (dm-5): Converting file system to meta_bg
[ 207.918790] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resizing filesystem from 4294967296 to 4831837696 blocks
[ 221.454050] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resized to 4658298880 blocks
[ 227.634613] EXT4-fs (dm-5): resized filesystem to 4831837696
Signed-off-by: Jerry Lee <jerrylee@qnap.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/PU1PR04MB22635E739BD21150DC182AC6A18C9@PU1PR04MB2263.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch avoids an attempt to resize the filesystem to an
unaligned cluster boundary. An online resize to a size that is not
integral to cluster size results in the last iteration attempting to
grow the fs by a negative amount, which trips a BUG_ON and leaves the fs
with a corrupted in-memory superblock.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Kiselev <okiselev@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0E92A0AB-4F16-4F1A-94B7-702CC6504FDE@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch avoids doing an O(n**2)-complexity walk through every flex group.
Instead, it uses the already computed overhead information for the newly
allocated space, and simply adds it to the previously calculated
overhead stored in the superblock. This drastically reduces the time
taken to resize very large bigalloc filesystems (from 3+ hours for a
64TB fs down to milliseconds).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Kiselev <okiselev@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CE4F359F-4779-45E6-B6A9-8D67FDFF5AE2@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When the EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS ioctl is complete, update the backup
superblocks. We don't do this for the old-style resize ioctls since
they are quite ancient, and only used by very old versions of
resize2fs --- and we don't want to update the backup superblocks every
time EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD is called, since it might get called a lot.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629040026.112371-2-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When doing an online resize, the on-disk superblock on-disk wasn't
updated. This means that when the file system is unmounted and
remounted, and the on-disk overhead value is non-zero, this would
result in the results of statfs(2) to be incorrect.
This was partially fixed by Commits 10b01ee92d ("ext4: fix overhead
calculation to account for the reserved gdt blocks"), 85d825dbf4
("ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no
sense"), and eb7054212e ("ext4: update the cached overhead value in
the superblock").
However, since it was too expensive to forcibly recalculate the
overhead for bigalloc file systems at every mount, this didn't fix the
problem for bigalloc file systems. This commit should address the
problem when resizing file systems with the bigalloc feature enabled.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629040026.112371-1-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We capture a NULL pointer issue when resizing a corrupt ext4 image which
is freshly clear resize_inode feature (not run e2fsck). It could be
simply reproduced by following steps. The problem is because of the
resize_inode feature was cleared, and it will convert the filesystem to
meta_bg mode in ext4_resize_fs(), but the es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks was
not reduced to zero, so could we mistakenly call reserve_backup_gdb()
and passing an uninitialized resize_inode to it when adding new group
descriptors.
mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda 3G
tune2fs -O ^resize_inode /dev/sda #forget to run requested e2fsck
mount /dev/sda /mnt
resize2fs /dev/sda 8G
========
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028
CPU: 19 PID: 3243 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 5.18.0-rc7-00001-gfde086c5ebfd #748
...
RIP: 0010:ext4_flex_group_add+0xe08/0x2570
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ext4_resize_fs+0xbec/0x1660
__ext4_ioctl+0x1749/0x24e0
ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xa6/0x110
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f2dd739617b
========
The fix is simple, add a check in ext4_resize_begin() to make sure that
the es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks is zero when the resize_inode feature is
disabled.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220601092717.763694-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_set_bits() should actually be mb_set_bits() for uniform API naming
convention.
This is via below cmd -
grep -nr "ext4_set_bits" fs/ext4/ | cut -d ":" -f 1 | xargs sed -i 's/ext4_set_bits/mb_set_bits/g'
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1f6ece1405b76a7a987e9145d1adfaf71e30695.1644992610.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Implement support for FS_IOC_GETFSLABEL and FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL ioctls for
online reading and setting of file system label.
ext4_ioctl_getlabel() is simple, just get the label from the primary
superblock. This might not be the first sb on the file system if
'sb=' mount option is used.
In ext4_ioctl_setlabel() we update what ext4 currently views as a
primary superblock and then proceed to update backup superblocks. There
are two caveats:
- the primary superblock might not be the first superblock and so it
might not be the one used by userspace tools if read directly
off the disk.
- because the primary superblock might not be the first superblock we
potentialy have to update it as part of backup superblock update.
However the first sb location is a bit more complicated than the rest
so we have to account for that.
The superblock modification is created generic enough so the
infrastructure can be used for other potential superblock modification
operations, such as chaning UUID.
Tested with generic/492 with various configurations. I also checked the
behavior with 'sb=' mount options, including very large file systems
with and without sparse_super/sparse_super2.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211213135618.43303-1-lczerner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
JBD2 layer support triggers which are called when journaling layer moves
buffer to a certain state. We can use the frozen trigger, which gets
called when buffer data is frozen and about to be written out to the
journal, to compute block checksums for some buffer types (similarly as
does ocfs2). This avoids unnecessary repeated recomputation of the
checksum (at the cost of larger window where memory corruption won't be
caught by checksumming) and is even necessary when there are
unsynchronized updaters of the checksummed data.
So add superblock and journal trigger type arguments to
ext4_journal_get_write_access() and ext4_journal_get_create_access() so
that frozen triggers can be set accordingly. Also add inode argument to
ext4_walk_page_buffers() and all the callbacks used with that function
for the same purpose. This patch is mostly only a change of prototype of
the above mentioned functions and a few small helpers. Real checksumming
will come later.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816095713.16537-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The function ext4_resize_begin() gets called from three different
places, and online resize for bigalloc file systems is disallowed from
the old-style online resize (EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD and
EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND), but it *is* supposed to be allowed via
EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS.
This reverts commit e9f9f61d0c.
The in-kernel ext4 resize code doesn't support filesystem with the
sparse_super2 feature. It fails with errors like this and doesn't finish
the resize:
EXT4-fs (loop0): resizing filesystem from 16640 to 7864320 blocks
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): verify_reserved_gdb:760: reserved GDT 2 missing grp 1 (32770)
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_resize_fs:2111: error (-22) occurred during file system resize
EXT4-fs (loop0): resized filesystem to 2097152
To reproduce:
mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -I 256 -J size=32 -E resize=$((256*1024*1024)) -O sparse_super2 ext4.img 65M
truncate -s 30G ext4.img
mount ext4.img /mnt
python3 -c 'import fcntl, os, struct ; fd = os.open("/mnt", os.O_RDONLY | os.O_DIRECTORY) ; fcntl.ioctl(fd, 0x40086610, struct.pack("Q", 30 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 // 4096), False) ; os.close(fd)'
dmesg | tail
e2fsck ext4.img
The userspace resize2fs tool has a check for this case: it checks if the
filesystem has sparse_super2 set and if the kernel provides
/sys/fs/ext4/features/sparse_super2. However, the former check requires
manually reading and parsing the filesystem superblock.
Detect this case in ext4_resize_begin and error out early with a clear
error message.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/74b8ae78405270211943cd7393e65586c5faeed1.1623093259.git.josh@joshtriplett.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The wrapper is now useless since it does what
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() does. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201216101844.22917-9-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Protect all superblock modifications (including checksum computation)
with a superblock buffer lock. That way we are sure computed checksum
matches current superblock contents (a mismatch could cause checksum
failures in nojournal mode or if an unjournalled superblock update races
with a journalled one). Also we avoid modifying superblock contents
while it is being written out (which can cause DIF/DIX failures if we
are running in nojournal mode).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201216101844.22917-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We have already remove open codes that invoke helpers provide by
fs/buffer.c in all places reading metadata buffers. This patch switch to
use ext4_sb_bread() to replace all sb_bread() helpers, which is
ext4_read_bh() helper back end.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924073337.861472-7-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Revome all open codes that read metadata buffers, switch to use
ext4_read_bh_*() common helpers.
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924073337.861472-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When ext4_journal_get_write_access() fails, we should
terminate the execution flow and release n_group_desc,
iloc.bh, dind and gdb_bh.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200829025403.3139-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
During an online resize an array of s_flex_groups structures gets replaced
so it can get enlarged. If there is a concurrent access to the array and
this memory has been reused then this can lead to an invalid memory access.
The s_flex_group array has been converted into an array of pointers rather
than an array of structures. This is to ensure that the information
contained in the structures cannot get out of sync during a resize due to
an accessor updating the value in the old structure after it has been
copied but before the array pointer is updated. Since the structures them-
selves are no longer copied but only the pointers to them this case is
mitigated.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-4-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
During an online resize an array of pointers to buffer heads gets
replaced so it can get enlarged. If there is a racing block
allocation or deallocation which uses the old array, and the old array
has gotten reused this can lead to a GPF or some other random kernel
memory getting modified.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206443
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221053458.730016-2-tytso@mit.edu
Reported-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
So far we have reserved only relatively high fixed amount of revoke
credits for each transaction. We over-reserved by large amount for most
cases but when freeing large directories or files with data journalling,
the fixed amount is not enough. In fact the worst case estimate is
inconveniently large (maximum extent size) for freeing of one extent.
We fix this by doing proper estimate of the amount of blocks that need
to be revoked when removing blocks from the inode due to truncate or
hole punching and otherwise reserve just a small amount of revoke
credits for each transaction to accommodate freeing of xattrs block or
so.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-23-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Provide ext4_journal_ensure_credits_fn() function to ensure transaction
has given amount of credits and call helper function to prepare for
restarting a transaction. This allows to remove some boilerplate code
from various places, add proper error handling for the case where
transaction extension or restart fails, and reduces following changes
needed for proper revoke record reservation tracking.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-10-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
using Unicode 12.1. Also, the usual largish number of cleanups and bug
fixes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEK2m5VNv+CHkogTfJ8vlZVpUNgaMFAlzSDXYACgkQ8vlZVpUN
gaPQ3Qf/Sh0NqHbmbdW1J52oh4GqUKUhUezEac40yZcZBU4p3PFPZ5Ji83kAQV5r
JgHx5YW4AYHs59UkRVq/er7wKEFJxAE8weUq90WYLE1Z/EjojDE8JHSsK00obKNN
rJOm5qX/gy5C7PVUSWkSuAZQPMSGrmH5U5ie0nrI7bFWnr7T5CQkWarspUq53JBG
RP910mPTT/otE7iTgUzjDeAMKfaSdtRhcJn/uTQ+2YZ1BJsHBHJHDnfQtd3CttHs
ncTUaqPnhWqOKJV2Y9TDyAWYeSbn30cF0dpBM38N4u6YwaUwrBp/kPI0tes97SgY
lZM4VEAW6iF+18uLSyv7D0Mpba9qQg==
=9R7U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Add as a feature case-insensitive directories (the casefold feature)
using Unicode 12.1.
Also, the usual largish number of cleanups and bug fixes"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (25 commits)
ext4: export /sys/fs/ext4/feature/casefold if Unicode support is present
ext4: fix ext4_show_options for file systems w/o journal
unicode: refactor the rule for regenerating utf8data.h
docs: ext4.rst: document case-insensitive directories
ext4: Support case-insensitive file name lookups
ext4: include charset encoding information in the superblock
MAINTAINERS: add Unicode subsystem entry
unicode: update unicode database unicode version 12.1.0
unicode: introduce test module for normalized utf8 implementation
unicode: implement higher level API for string handling
unicode: reduce the size of utf8data[]
unicode: introduce code for UTF-8 normalization
unicode: introduce UTF-8 character database
ext4: actually request zeroing of inode table after grow
ext4: cond_resched in work-heavy group loops
ext4: fix use-after-free race with debug_want_extra_isize
ext4: avoid drop reference to iloc.bh twice
ext4: ignore e_value_offs for xattrs with value-in-ea-inode
ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity
ext4: use BUG() instead of BUG_ON(1)
...
The reference to iloc.bh has been dropped in ext4_mark_iloc_dirty.
However, the reference is dropped again if error occurs during
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata, which may result in use-after-free bugs.
Fixes: fb265c9cb49e("ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases")
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
