IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We were marking the end of where we could insert incorrectly for
indirect extents.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is unfortunately really fragile - hopefully we'll be able to think
of a new approach at some point.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, BTREE_ID_INODES was special - inodes were indexed by the
inode field, which meant the offset field of struct bpos wasn't used,
which led to special cases in e.g. the btree iterator code.
Now, inodes in the inodes btree are indexed by the offset field.
Also: prevously min_key was special for extents btrees, min_key for
extents would equal max_key for the previous node. Now, min_key =
bkey_successor() of the previous node, same as non extent btrees.
This means we can completely get rid of
btree_type_sucessor/predecessor.
Also make some improvements to the metadata IO validate/compat code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This fixes a transaction iterator overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ever since the btree code was first written, handling of overwriting
existing extents - including partially overwriting and splittin existing
extents - was handled as part of the core btree insert path. The modern
transaction and iterator infrastructure didn't exist then, so that was
the only way for it to be done.
This patch moves that outside of the core btree code to a pass that runs
at transaction commit time.
This is a significant simplification to the btree code and overall
reduction in code size, but more importantly it gets us much closer to
the core btree code being completely independent of extents and is
important prep work for snapshots.
This introduces a new feature bit; the old and new extent update models
are incompatible when the filesystem needs journal replay.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This should be private to btree_update_leaf.c, and we might end up
removing it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, partial overwrites of existing extents were handled
implicitly by the btree code; when reading in a btree node, we'd do a
mergesort of the different bsets and detect and fix partially
overlapping extents during that mergesort.
That approach won't work with snapshots: this changes extents to work
like regular keys as far as the btree code is concerned, where a 0 size
KEY_TYPE_deleted whiteout will completely overwrite an existing extent.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is prep work for snapshots: the algorithm in
bch2_extent_sort_fix_overlapping() will break when we have multiple
overlapping extents in unrelated snapshots - but, we'll be able to make
extents work like regular keys and use bch2_key_sort_fix_overlapping()
for extent btree nodes if we make a couple changes - the main one being
to always emit new extents when we partially overwrite an existing
(written) extent.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
