IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Some i915 selftests still use i915_vma_lock() as inner lock, and
intel_context_create_request() intel_timeline->mutex as outer lock.
Fortunately for selftests this is not an issue, they should be fixed
but we can move ahead and cleanify lockdep now.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-19-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
As a preparation step for full object locking and wait/wound handling
during pin and object mapping, ensure that we always pass the ww context
in i915_gem_execbuffer.c to i915_vma_pin, use lockdep to ensure this
happens.
This also requires changing the order of eb_parse slightly, to ensure
we pass ww at a point where we could still handle -EDEADLK safely.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Instead of doing everything inside of pin_mutex, we move all pinning
outside. Because i915_active has its own reference counting and
pinning is also having the same issues vs mutexes, we make sure
everything is pinned first, so the pinning in i915_active only needs
to bump refcounts. This allows us to take pin refcounts correctly
all the time.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-14-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
On eviction, we acquire the vm->mutex and then wait on the vma->active.
Therefore when binding and pinning the vma, we must follow the same
sequence, lock/pin the vma then mark it active. Otherwise, we mark the
vma as active, then wait for the vm->mutex, and meanwhile the evictor
holding the mutex waits upon us to complete our activity.
Fixes: 8ccfc20a7d56 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark ring->vma as active while pinned")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200706170138.8993-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 8567774e87e23a57155e5102f81208729b992ae6)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This assertion was removed in commit b412c63f1cba ("drm/i915/gt: Report
context-is-closed prior to pinning"), but accidentally restored by a
cherry-pick into drm-next and now has percolated back to
drm-intel-next-queued.
Fixes: 2e46a2a0b014 ("drm/i915: Use explicit flag to mark unreachable intel_context")
Fixes: 2b703bbda271 ("Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queued")
References: b412c63f1cba ("drm/i915/gt: Report context-is-closed prior to pinning")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520073048.2394034-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit f2c1061a3677b400a945d9238f17bf33d669acff)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
I need to keep the GEM context around a bit longer so adding an explicit
flag for syncing execbuf with closed/abandonded contexts.
v2:
* Use already available context flags. (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200319170707.8262-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 207e4a71fb53e761be72daaeb78a49225bc31c69)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
It is strictly sufficient to only delay the intel_engine_pm_put from the
context barrier (and not from the context exit) in order to prevent the
gem_exec_nop contention. Adding the delay to the context exit incurs
noticably extra penalty for soft-rc6.
Fixes: edee52c927ef ("drm/i915/gt: Delay release of engine-pm after last retirement")
Testcase: igt/i915_pm_rc6_residency/rc6-idle
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323192029.20723-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Keep the engine-pm awake until the next jiffie, to avoid immediate
ping-pong under moderate load. (Forcing the idle barrier excerbates the
moderate load, dramatically increasing the driver overhead.) On the
other hand, delaying the idle-barrier slightly incurs longer rc6-off
and so more power consumption.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/848
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
A silly cut'n'paste copied the unlocked error path and used it inside
the pin_mutex lock, we need to drop that lock before returning.
Fixes: b412c63f1cba ("drm/i915/gt: Report context-is-closed prior to pinning")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200322123241.17694-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
I need to keep the GEM context around a bit longer so adding an explicit
flag for syncing execbuf with closed/abandonded contexts.
v2:
* Use already available context flags. (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200319170707.8262-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
GPU saves accumulated context runtime (in CS timestamp units) in PPHWSP
which will be useful for us in cases when we are not able to track context
busyness ourselves (like with GuC). Keep a copy of this in struct
intel_context from where it can be easily read even if the context is not
pinned.
v2:
(Chris)
* Do not store pphwsp address in intel_context.
* Log CS wrap-around.
* Simplify calculation by relying on integer wraparound.
v3:
* Include total/avg in traces and error state for debugging
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200216133620.394962-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we use the active state to keep the vma alive while we are reading
its contents during GPU error capture, we need to mark the
ring->vma as active during execution if we want to include the rinbuffer
in the error state.
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: b1e3177bd1d8 ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110110402.1231745-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we use the active state to keep the vma alive while we are reading
its contents during GPU error capture, we need to mark the
context->state vma as active during execution if we want to include it
in the error state.
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: b1e3177bd1d8 ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110110402.1231745-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we have moved the runtime-pm management out of
intel_context_acctive_acquire, and that itself out of ce->ops->pin(), no
explicit runtime pm wakeref is required in intel_context_pin().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200109085717.873326-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
While this is encroaching on midlayer territory, having already made the
state allocation a previous step in pinning, we can now pull the common
intel_context_active_acquire() into intel_context_pin() itself. This is
a prelude to make the activation a separate step inside pinning, outside
of the ce->pin_mutex
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200109085717.873326-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Allow for knowledgeable users to preallocate the context state, and to
separate the allocation step from the pinning step during
intel_context_pin()
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200109085717.873326-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The last remaining reason for serialising the pin/unpin of the
intel_context is to ensure that our preallocated wakerefs are not
consumed too early (i.e. the unpin of the previous phase does not emit
the idle barriers for this phase before we even submit). All of the
other operations within the context pin/unpin are supposed to be
atomic... Therefore, we can reduce the serialisation to being just on
the i915_active.preallocated_barriers itself and drop the nested
pin_mutex from intel_context_unpin().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Convert the few remaining GEM_TRACE() used for debugging over to the
appropriate GT_TRACE or RQ_TRACE.
References: 639f2f24895f ("drm/i915: Introduce new macros for tracing")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing
a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate
address space (for our own protection).
Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop
referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random
and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use.
GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context
the execution environment on the GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Instead of rummaging through the intel_context to peek at the GEM
context in the middle of request submission to decide whether to use
semaphores, store that information on the intel_context itself.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with
the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer
cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references
to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to
client interfaces and self-contained.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and
GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine
name with contexts and requests tracing in i915.
Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com
Rather than assume if and only if the engine->default_state is not set
that the context is invalid, instead track when we know the context has
valid state -- either because we have copied the default_state or we
have completed a context switch to save the HW state.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203124155.3019926-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The expected downside to commit 58b4c1a07ada ("drm/i915: Reduce nested
prepare_remote_context() to a trylock") was that it would need to return
-EAGAIN to userspace in order to resolve potential mutex inversion. Such
an unsightly round trip is unnecessary if we could atomically insert a
barrier into the i915_active_fence, so make it happen.
Currently, we use the timeline->mutex (or some other named outer lock)
to order insertion into the i915_active_fence (and so individual nodes
of i915_active). Inside __i915_active_fence_set, we only need then
serialise with the interrupt handler in order to claim the timeline for
ourselves.
However, if we remove the outer lock, we need to ensure the order is
intact between not only multiple threads trying to insert themselves
into the timeline, but also with the interrupt handler completing the
previous occupant. We use xchg() on insert so that we have an ordered
sequence of insertions (and each caller knows the previous fence on
which to wait, preserving the chain of all fences in the timeline), but
we then have to cmpxchg() in the interrupt handler to avoid overwriting
the new occupant. The only nasty side-effect is having to temporarily
strip off the RCU-annotations to apply the atomic operations, otherwise
the rules are much more conventional!
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Fixes: 58b4c1a07ada ("drm/i915: Reduce nested prepare_remote_context() to a trylock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127134527.3438410-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
On context retiring, we may invoke the kernel_context to unpin this
context. Elsewhere, we may use the kernel_context to modify this
context. This currently leads to an AB-BA lock inversion, so we need to
back-off from the contended lock, and repeat.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111732
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: a9877da2d629 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126065521.2331017-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Avoid going to the base i915 device when we already have a path from gt
to the runtime powermanagement interface. The benefit is that it looks a
bit more self-consistent to always be acquiring the gt->uncore->rpm for
use with the gt->uncore.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191007154531.1750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Keep track of the GEM contexts underneath i915->gem.contexts and assign
them their own lock for the purposes of list management.
v2: Focus on lock tracking; ctx->vm is protected by ctx->mutex
v3: Correct split with removal of logical HW ID
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its
own mutex handling for active/retire.
This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no
active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules,
nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More
challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active
rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by
struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the
i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller
using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to
interact with the dma_fence callback lists).
The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we
now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context,
etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in
fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients
(eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads.
v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :(
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we need to use a mutex to serialise i915_active activation
(because we want to allow the callback to sleep), we need to push the
i915_active.retire into a worker callback in case we get need to retire
from an atomic context.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
the warnings about dangerous access.
One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
timeline.
v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
refactoring (i915_active_add_request)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As every i915_active_request should be serialised by a dedicated lock,
i915_active consists of a tree of locks; one for each node. Markup up
the i915_active_request with what lock is supposed to be guarding it so
that we can verify that the serialised updated are indeed serialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816121000.8507-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Move the timeline from being inside the intel_ring to intel_context
itself. This saves much pointer dancing and makes the relations of the
context to its timeline much clearer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190809182518.20486-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Refactor the backends to handle the deferred context allocation in a
consistent manner, and allow calling it as an explicit first step in
pinning a context for the first time. This should make it easier for
backends to keep track of partially constructed contexts from
initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190809182518.20486-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state
and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker
skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists
entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting.
By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report
a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker
deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will
persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system
into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller).
v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc
allocations (Tvrtko)
v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the
link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By placing our idle-barriers in the i915_active fence tree, we expose
those for reuse by other components that are issuing requests along the
kernel_context. Reusing the proto-barrier active_node is perfectly fine
as the new request implies a context-switch, and so an opportune point
to run the idle-barrier. However, the proto-barrier is not equivalent
to a normal active_node and care must be taken to avoid dereferencing the
ERR_PTR used as its request marker.
v2: Comment the more egregious cheek
v3: A glossary!
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: ce476c80b8bf ("drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch")
Fixes: a9877da2d629 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802100015.1281-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Track the currently bound address space used by the HW context. Minor
conversions to use the local intel_context.vm are made, leaving behind
some more surgery required to make intel_context the primary through the
selftests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730143209.4549-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Modifying a remote context requires careful serialisation with requests
on that context, and that serialisation requires us to take their
timeline->mutex. Make it so.
Note that while struct_mutex rules, we can't create more than one
request in parallel, but that age is soon coming to an end.
v2: Though it doesn't affect the current users, contexts may share
timelines so check if we already hold the right mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725131447.27515-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Prior to freeing the struct, call the fini function to cleanup the
common members. Currently this only calls the debug functions to mark
the structs as destroyed, but may be extended to real work in future.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190718070024.21781-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Avoid a global idle barrier by reconfiguring each context by rewriting
them with MI_STORE_DWORD from the kernel context.
v2: We only need to determine the desired register values once, they are
the same for all contexts.
v3: Don't remove the kernel context from the list of known GEM contexts;
the world is not ready for that yet.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716213443.9874-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
