IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
smatch reports:
drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c:295:21: warning: symbol
'mock_iommu_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
This variable is only used in one file so it should be static.
Fixes: 65c619ae06 ("iommufd/selftest: Make selftest create a more complete mock device")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404002317.1912530-1-trix@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Yi Liu says
===================
The .bind_iommufd op of vfio emulated devices are either empty or does
nothing. This is different with the vfio physical devices, to add vfio
device cdev, need to make them act the same.
This series first makes the .bind_iommufd op of vfio emulated devices to
create iommufd_access, this introduces a new iommufd API. Then let the
driver that does not provide .bind_iommufd op to use the vfio emulated
iommufd op set. This makes all vfio device drivers have consistent iommufd
operations, which is good for adding new device uAPIs in the device cdev
===================
* branch 'vfio_mdev_ops':
vfio: Check the presence for iommufd callbacks in __vfio_register_dev()
vfio/mdev: Uses the vfio emulated iommufd ops set in the mdev sample drivers
vfio-iommufd: Make vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() return iommufd_access ID
vfio-iommufd: No need to record iommufd_ctx in vfio_device
iommufd: Create access in vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind()
iommu/iommufd: Pass iommufd_ctx pointer in iommufd_get_ioas()
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
vfio device cdev needs to return iommufd_access ID to userspace if
bind_iommufd succeeds.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327093351.44505-5-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
There are needs to created iommufd_access prior to have an IOAS and set
IOAS later. Like the vfio device cdev needs to have an iommufd object
to represent the bond (iommufd_access) and IOAS replacement.
Moves the iommufd_access_create() call into vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(),
making it symmetric with the __vfio_iommufd_access_destroy() call in the
vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(). This means an access is created/destroyed
by the bind()/unbind(), and the vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas() only
updates the access->ioas pointer.
Since vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() does not provide ioas_id, drop it from
the argument list of iommufd_access_create(). Instead, add a new access
API iommufd_access_attach() to set the access->ioas pointer. Also, set
vdev->iommufd_attached accordingly, similar to the physical pathway.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327093351.44505-3-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
No need to pass the iommufd_ucmd pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327093351.44505-2-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
iommufd wants to use more infrastructure, like the iommu_group, that the
mock device does not support. Create a more complete mock device that can
go through the whole cycle of ownership, blocking domain, and has an
iommu_group.
This requires creating a real struct device on a real bus to be able to
connect it to a iommu_group. Unfortunately we cannot formally attach the
mock iommu driver as an actual driver as the iommu core does not allow
more than one driver or provide a general way for busses to link to
iommus. This can be solved with a little hack to open code the dev_iommus
struct.
With this infrastructure things work exactly the same as the normal domain
path, including the auto domains mechanism and direct attach of hwpts. As
the created hwpt is now an autodomain it is no longer required to destroy
it and trying to do so will trigger a failure.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/11-v3-ae9c2975a131+2e1e8-iommufd_hwpt_jgg@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
It is too confusing now that we have the 'dev_id' as part of the main
interface. Make it clear this is the special selftest device object. This
object is analogous to the VFIO device FD.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7-v3-ae9c2975a131+2e1e8-iommufd_hwpt_jgg@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Provide a mock kernel module for the iommu_domain that allows it to run
without any HW and the mocking provides a way to directly validate that
the PFNs loaded into the iommu_domain are correct. This exposes the access
kAPI toward userspace to allow userspace to explore the functionality of
pages.c and io_pagetable.c
The mock also simulates the rare case of PAGE_SIZE > iommu page size as
the mock will operate at a 2K iommu page size. This allows exercising all
of the calculations to support this mismatch.
This is also intended to support syzkaller exploring the same space.
However, it is an unusually invasive config option to enable all of
this. The config option should not be enabled in a production kernel.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/16-v6-a196d26f289e+11787-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> # aarch64
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
