IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There are only 2 direct calls to set_extent_bit outside of extent-io -
in btrfs_find_new_delalloc_bytes and btrfs_truncate_block, the rest are
thin wrappers around __set_extent_bit. This adds unnecessary indirection
and just makes it more annoying when looking at the various extent bit
manipulation functions. This patch renames __set_extent_bit to
set_extent_bit effectively removing a level of indirection. No
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ reformat and remove __must_check ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It is unused everywhere now, it can be removed.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are several occasions where we do not update the inode's number of
used bytes atomically, resulting in a concurrent stat(2) syscall to report
a value of used blocks that does not correspond to a valid value, that is,
a value that does not match neither what we had before the operation nor
what we get after the operation completes.
In extreme cases it can result in stat(2) reporting zero used blocks, which
can cause problems for some userspace tools where they can consider a file
with a non-zero size and zero used blocks as completely sparse and skip
reading data, as reported/discussed a long time ago in some threads like
the following:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2016-07/msg00001.html
The cases where this can happen are the following:
-> Case 1
If we do a write (buffered or direct IO) against a file region for which
there is already an allocated extent (or multiple extents), then we have a
short time window where we can report a number of used blocks to stat(2)
that does not take into account the file region being overwritten. This
short time window happens when completing the ordered extent(s).
This happens because when we drop the extents in the write range we
decrement the inode's number of bytes and later on when we insert the new
extent(s) we increment the number of bytes in the inode, resulting in a
short time window where a stat(2) syscall can get an incorrect number of
used blocks.
If we do writes that overwrite an entire file, then we have a short time
window where we report 0 used blocks to stat(2).
Example reproducer:
$ cat reproducer-1.sh
#!/bin/bash
MNT=/mnt/sdi
DEV=/dev/sdi
stat_loop()
{
trap "wait; exit" SIGTERM
local filepath=$1
local expected=$2
local got
while :; do
got=$(stat -c %b $filepath)
if [ $got -ne $expected ]; then
echo -n "ERROR: unexpected used blocks"
echo " (got: $got expected: $expected)"
fi
done
}
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.xfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.f2fs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.reiserfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -b 64K 0 64K" $MNT/foobar >/dev/null
expected=$(stat -c %b $MNT/foobar)
# Create a process to keep calling stat(2) on the file and see if the
# reported number of blocks used (disk space used) changes, it should
# not because we are not increasing the file size nor punching holes.
stat_loop $MNT/foobar $expected &
loop_pid=$!
for ((i = 0; i < 50000; i++)); do
xfs_io -s -c "pwrite -b 64K 0 64K" $MNT/foobar >/dev/null
done
kill $loop_pid &> /dev/null
wait
umount $DEV
$ ./reproducer-1.sh
ERROR: unexpected used blocks (got: 0 expected: 128)
ERROR: unexpected used blocks (got: 0 expected: 128)
(...)
Note that since this is a short time window where the race can happen, the
reproducer may not be able to always trigger the bug in one run, or it may
trigger it multiple times.
-> Case 2
If we do a buffered write against a file region that does not have any
allocated extents, like a hole or beyond EOF, then during ordered extent
completion we have a short time window where a concurrent stat(2) syscall
can report a number of used blocks that does not correspond to the value
before or after the write operation, a value that is actually larger than
the value after the write completes.
This happens because once we start a buffered write into an unallocated
file range we increment the inode's 'new_delalloc_bytes', to make sure
any stat(2) call gets a correct used blocks value before delalloc is
flushed and completes. However at ordered extent completion, after we
inserted the new extent, we increment the inode's number of bytes used
with the size of the new extent, and only later, when clearing the range
in the inode's iotree, we decrement the inode's 'new_delalloc_bytes'
counter with the size of the extent. So this results in a short time
window where a concurrent stat(2) syscall can report a number of used
blocks that accounts for the new extent twice.
Example reproducer:
$ cat reproducer-2.sh
#!/bin/bash
MNT=/mnt/sdi
DEV=/dev/sdi
stat_loop()
{
trap "wait; exit" SIGTERM
local filepath=$1
local expected=$2
local got
while :; do
got=$(stat -c %b $filepath)
if [ $got -ne $expected ]; then
echo -n "ERROR: unexpected used blocks"
echo " (got: $got expected: $expected)"
fi
done
}
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.xfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.f2fs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.reiserfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
touch $MNT/foobar
write_size=$((64 * 1024))
for ((i = 0; i < 16384; i++)); do
offset=$(($i * $write_size))
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab $offset $write_size" $MNT/foobar >/dev/null
blocks_used=$(stat -c %b $MNT/foobar)
# Fsync the file to trigger writeback and keep calling stat(2) on it
# to see if the number of blocks used changes.
stat_loop $MNT/foobar $blocks_used &
loop_pid=$!
xfs_io -c "fsync" $MNT/foobar
kill $loop_pid &> /dev/null
wait $loop_pid
done
umount $DEV
$ ./reproducer-2.sh
ERROR: unexpected used blocks (got: 265472 expected: 265344)
ERROR: unexpected used blocks (got: 284032 expected: 283904)
(...)
Note that since this is a short time window where the race can happen, the
reproducer may not be able to always trigger the bug in one run, or it may
trigger it multiple times.
-> Case 3
Another case where such problems happen is during other operations that
replace extents in a file range with other extents. Those operations are
extent cloning, deduplication and fallocate's zero range operation.
The cause of the problem is similar to the first case. When we drop the
extents from a range, we decrement the inode's number of bytes, and later
on, after inserting the new extents we increment it. Since this is not
done atomically, a concurrent stat(2) call can see and return a number of
used blocks that is smaller than it should be, does not match the number
of used blocks before or after the clone/deduplication/zero operation.
Like for the first case, when doing a clone, deduplication or zero range
operation against an entire file, we end up having a time window where we
can report 0 used blocks to a stat(2) call.
Example reproducer:
$ cat reproducer-3.sh
#!/bin/bash
MNT=/mnt/sdi
DEV=/dev/sdi
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null
# mkfs.xfs -f -m reflink=1 $DEV > /dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
extent_size=$((64 * 1024))
num_extents=16384
file_size=$(($extent_size * $num_extents))
# File foo has many small extents.
xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b $extent_size 0 $file_size" $MNT/foo \
> /dev/null
# File bar has much less extents and has exactly the same data as foo.
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 $file_size" $MNT/bar > /dev/null
expected=$(stat -c %b $MNT/foo)
# Now deduplicate bar into foo. While the deduplication is in progres,
# the number of used blocks/file size reported by stat should not change
xfs_io -c "dedupe $MNT/bar 0 0 $file_size" $MNT/foo > /dev/null &
dedupe_pid=$!
while [ -n "$(ps -p $dedupe_pid -o pid=)" ]; do
used=$(stat -c %b $MNT/foo)
if [ $used -ne $expected ]; then
echo "Unexpected blocks used: $used (expected: $expected)"
fi
done
umount $DEV
$ ./reproducer-3.sh
Unexpected blocks used: 2076800 (expected: 2097152)
Unexpected blocks used: 2097024 (expected: 2097152)
Unexpected blocks used: 2079872 (expected: 2097152)
(...)
Note that since this is a short time window where the race can happen, the
reproducer may not be able to always trigger the bug in one run, or it may
trigger it multiple times.
So fix this by:
1) Making btrfs_drop_extents() not decrement the VFS inode's number of
bytes, and instead return the number of bytes;
2) Making any code that drops extents and adds new extents update the
inode's number of bytes atomically, while holding the btrfs inode's
spinlock, which is also used by the stat(2) callback to get the inode's
number of bytes;
3) For ranges in the inode's iotree that are marked as 'delalloc new',
corresponding to previously unallocated ranges, increment the inode's
number of bytes when clearing the 'delalloc new' bit from the range,
in the same critical section that decrements the inode's
'new_delalloc_bytes' counter, delimited by the btrfs inode's spinlock.
An alternative would be to have btrfs_getattr() wait for any IO (ordered
extents in progress) and locking the whole range (0 to (u64)-1) while it
it computes the number of blocks used. But that would mean blocking
stat(2), which is a very used syscall and expected to be fast, waiting
for writes, clone/dedupe, fallocate, page reads, fiemap, etc.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Both Filipe and Fedora QA recently hit the following lockdep splat:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.10.0-0.rc1.20201028gited8780e3f2ec.57.fc34.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
rsync/2610 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff89617ed48f20 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8961757b1130 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&eb->lock);
lock(&eb->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
2 locks held by rsync/2610:
#0: ffff896107212b90 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: walk_component+0x10c/0x190
#1: ffff8961757b1130 (&eb->lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 2610 Comm: rsync Not tainted 5.10.0-0.rc1.20201028gited8780e3f2ec.57.fc34.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
__lock_acquire.cold+0x12d/0x2a4
? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30
? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
lock_acquire+0xc8/0x400
? btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
? read_block_for_search.isra.0+0xdd/0x320
_raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0
? btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic+0x34/0x140
btrfs_search_slot+0x616/0x9a0
btrfs_lookup_dir_item+0x6c/0xb0
btrfs_lookup_dentry+0xa8/0x520
? lockdep_init_map_waits+0x4c/0x210
btrfs_lookup+0xe/0x30
__lookup_slow+0x10f/0x1e0
walk_component+0x11b/0x190
path_lookupat+0x72/0x1c0
filename_lookup+0x97/0x180
? strncpy_from_user+0x96/0x1e0
? getname_flags.part.0+0x45/0x1a0
vfs_statx+0x64/0x100
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xff/0x180
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
__do_sys_newlstat+0x26/0x40
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xff/0x180
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80
? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
I have also seen a report of lockdep complaining about the lock class
that was looked up being the same as the lock class on the lock we were
using, but I can't find the report.
These are problems that occur because we do not have the lockdep class
set on the extent buffer until _after_ we read the eb in properly. This
is problematic for concurrent readers, because we will create the extent
buffer, lock it, and then attempt to read the extent buffer.
If a second thread comes in and tries to do a search down the same path
they'll get the above lockdep splat because the class isn't set properly
on the extent buffer.
There was a good reason for this, we generally didn't know the real
owner of the eb until we read it, specifically in refcounted roots.
However now all refcounted roots have the same class name, so we no
longer need to worry about this. For non-refcounted trees we know
which root we're on based on the parent.
Fix this by setting the lockdep class on the eb at creation time instead
of read time. This will fix the splat and the weirdness where the class
changes in the middle of locking the block.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we've plumbed all of the callers to have the owner root and the
level, plumb it down into alloc_extent_buffer().
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're going to pass around more information when we allocate extent
buffers, in order to make that cleaner how we do readahead. Most of the
callers have the parent node that we're getting our blockptr from, with
the sole exception of relocation which simply has the bytenr it wants to
read.
Add a helper that takes the current arguments that we need (bytenr and
gen), and add another helper for simply reading the slot out of a node.
In followup patches the helper that takes all the extra arguments will
be expanded, and the simpler helper won't need to have it's arguments
adjusted.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For subpage sector size support, one page can contain multiple tree
blocks. The entries cannot be based on page size and index must be
derived from the sectorsize. No change for page size == sector size.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When calling attach_extent_buffer_page(), either we're attaching
anonymous pages, called from btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(),
or we're attaching btree inode pages, called from alloc_extent_buffer().
For the latter case, we should hold page->mapping->private_lock to avoid
parallel changes to page->private.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fs_info value is 32bit, switch also the local u16 variables. This
leads to a better assembly code generated due to movzwl.
This simple change will shave some bytes on x86_64 and release config:
text data bss dec hex filename
1090000 17980 14912 1122892 11224c pre/btrfs.ko
1089794 17980 14912 1122686 11217e post/btrfs.ko
DELTA: -206
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_get_16 shows up in the system performance profiles (helper to read
16bit values from on-disk structures). This is partially because of the
checksum size that's frequently read along with data reads/writes, other
u16 uses are from item size or directory entries.
Replace all calls to btrfs_super_csum_size by the cached value from
fs_info.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The value of super_block::s_blocksize_bits is the same as
fs_info::sectorsize_bits, but we don't need to do the extra dereferences
in many functions and storing the bits as u32 (in fs_info) generates
shorter assembly.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The variable @page_size in submit_extent_page() is not related to page
size.
It can already be smaller than PAGE_SIZE, so rename it to io_size to
reduce confusion, this is especially important for later subpage
support.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we're reading partial page, btrfs will warn about this as read/write
is always done in sector size, which now equals page size.
But for the upcoming subpage read-only support, our data read is only
aligned to sectorsize, which can be smaller than page size.
Thus here we change the warning condition to check it against
sectorsize, the behavior is not changed for regular sectorsize ==
PAGE_SIZE case, and won't report error for subpage read.
Also, pass the proper start/end with bv_offset for check_data_csum() to
handle.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Function process_pages_contig() does not only handle page locking but
also other operations. Rename the local variable pages_locked to
pages_processed to reduce confusion.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The @failed_start parameter is only paired with @exclusive_bits, and
those parameters are only used for EXTENT_LOCKED bit, which have their
own wrappers lock_extent_bits().
Thus for regular set_extent_bit() calls, the failed_start makes no
sense, just sink the parameter.
Also, since @failed_start and @exclusive_bits are used in pairs, add
an assert to make it obvious.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The pitfall here is, if the parameter @bits has multiple bits set, we
will return the first range which just has one of the specified bits
set.
This is a little tricky if we want an exact match. Anyway, update the
comment to make that clear.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The return value of that function is completely wrong.
That function only returns 0 if the extent buffer doesn't need to be
submitted. The "ret = 1" and "ret = 0" are determined by the return
value of "test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &eb->bflags)".
And if we get ret == 1, it's because the extent buffer is dirty, and we
set its status to EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_BACK, and continue to page
locking.
While if we get ret == 0, it means the extent is not dirty from the
beginning, so we don't need to write it back.
The caller also follows this, in btree_write_cache_pages(), if
lock_extent_buffer_for_io() returns 0, we just skip the extent buffer
completely.
So the comment is completely wrong.
Since we're here, also change the description a little. The write bio
flushing won't be visible to the caller, thus it's not an major feature.
In the main description, only describe the locking part to make the
point more clear.
For reference, added in commit 2e3c25136a ("btrfs: extent_io: add
proper error handling to lock_extent_buffer_for_io()")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Historically we've implemented our own locking because we wanted to be
able to selectively spin or sleep based on what we were doing in the
tree. For instance, if all of our nodes were in cache then there's
rarely a reason to need to sleep waiting for node locks, as they'll
likely become available soon. At the time this code was written the
rw_semaphore didn't do adaptive spinning, and thus was orders of
magnitude slower than our home grown locking.
However now the opposite is the case. There are a few problems with how
we implement blocking locks, namely that we use a normal waitqueue and
simply wake everybody up in reverse sleep order. This leads to some
suboptimal performance behavior, and a lot of context switches in highly
contended cases. The rw_semaphores actually do this properly, and also
have adaptive spinning that works relatively well.
The locking code is also a bit of a bear to understand, and we lose the
benefit of lockdep for the most part because the blocking states of the
lock are simply ad-hoc and not mapped into lockdep.
So rework the locking code to drop all of this custom locking stuff, and
simply use a rw_semaphore for everything. This makes the locking much
simpler for everything, as we can now drop a lot of cruft and blocking
transitions. The performance numbers vary depending on the workload,
because generally speaking there doesn't tend to be a lot of contention
on the btree. However, on my test system which is an 80 core single
socket system with 256GiB of RAM and a 2TiB NVMe drive I get the
following results (with all debug options off):
dbench 200 baseline
Throughput 216.056 MB/sec 200 clients 200 procs max_latency=1471.197 ms
dbench 200 with patch
Throughput 737.188 MB/sec 200 clients 200 procs max_latency=714.346 ms
Previously we also used fs_mark to test this sort of contention, and
those results are far less impressive, mostly because there's not enough
tasks to really stress the locking
fs_mark -d /d[0-15] -S 0 -L 20 -n 100000 -s 0 -t 16
baseline
Average Files/sec: 160166.7
p50 Files/sec: 165832
p90 Files/sec: 123886
p99 Files/sec: 123495
real 3m26.527s
user 2m19.223s
sys 48m21.856s
patched
Average Files/sec: 164135.7
p50 Files/sec: 171095
p90 Files/sec: 122889
p99 Files/sec: 113819
real 3m29.660s
user 2m19.990s
sys 44m12.259s
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
While using compression, a submitted bio is mapped with a compressed bio
which performs the read from disk, decompresses and returns uncompressed
data to original bio. The original bio must reflect the uncompressed
size (iosize) of the I/O to be performed, or else the page just gets the
decompressed I/O length of data (disk_io_size). The compressed bio
checks the extent map and gets the correct length while performing the
I/O from disk.
This came up in subpage work when only compressed length of the original
bio was filled in the page. This worked correctly for pagesize ==
sectorsize because both compressed and uncompressed data are at pagesize
boundaries, and would end up filling the requested page.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer used just remove the function and any related code which
was initialising it for inodes. No functional changes.
Removing 8 bytes from extent_io_tree in turn reduces size of other
structures where it is embedded, notably btrfs_inode where it reduces
size by 24 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
No need to go through a function pointer indirection simply call
submit_bio_hook directly by exporting and renaming the helper to
btrfs_submit_metadata_bio. This makes the code more readable and should
result in somewhat faster code due to no longer paying the price for
specualtive attack mitigations that come with indirect function calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead export and rename the function to btrfs_submit_data_bio and
call it directly in submit_one_bio. This avoids paying the cost for
speculative attacks mitigations and improves code readability.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use the is_data_inode helper.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
BTRFS has 2 inode types (for the purposes of the code in submit_one_bio)
- ordinary data inodes (including the freespace inode) and the btree
inode. Both of these implement submit_bio_hook so btrfsic_submit_bio can
never be called from submit_one_bio so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Don't call readpage_end_io_hook for the btree inode. Instead of relying
on indirect calls to implement metadata buffer validation simply check
if the inode whose page we are processing equals the btree inode. If it
does call the necessary function.
This is an improvement in 2 directions:
1. We aren't paying the penalty of indirect calls in a post-speculation
attacks world.
2. The function is now named more explicitly so it's obvious what's
going on
This is in preparation to removing struct extent_io_ops altogether.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This makes reading the code a tad easier by decreasing the level of
indirection by one.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's always set to 0 by the 2 callers so move it inside __do_readpage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's always set to 0 by its sole caller - btrfs_readpage. Simply remove
it.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's always set to 0 from the sole caller - btrfs_readpage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that btrfs_readpage is the only caller of extent_read_full_page the
latter can be open coded in the former. Use the occassion to rename
__extent_read_full_page to extent_read_full_page. To facillitate this
change submit_one_bio has to be exported as well.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's called only from btrfs_readpage which always passes 0 so just sink
the argument into extent_read_full_page.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that this function is only responsible for reading data pages it's
no longer necessary to pass get_extent_t parameter across several
layers of functions. This patch removes this parameter from multiple
functions: __get_extent_map/__do_readpage/__extent_read_full_page/
extent_read_full_page and simply calls btrfs_get_extent directly in
__get_extent_map.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Metadata pages currently use __do_readpage to read metadata pages,
unfortunately this function is also used to deal with ordinary data
pages. This makes the metadata pages reading code to go through multiple
hoops in order to adhere to __do_readpage invariants. Most of these are
necessary for data pages which could be compressed. For metadata it's
enough to simply build a bio and submit it.
To this effect simply call submit_extent_page directly from
read_extent_buffer_pages which is the only callpath used to populate
extent_buffers with data. This in turn enables further cleanups.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's counterintuitive to have a function named btrfs_inode_xxx which
takes a generic inode. Also move the function to btrfs_inode.h so that
it has access to the definition of struct btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nested locking with lockdep and everything else refers to lock hierarchy
within the same lock map. This is how we indicate the same locks for
different objects are ok to take in a specific order, for our use case
that would be to take the lock on a leaf and then take a lock on an
adjacent leaf.
What ->lock_nested _actually_ refers to is if we happen to already be
holding the write lock on the extent buffer and we're allowing a read
lock to be taken on that extent buffer, which is recursion. Rename this
so we don't get confused when we switch to a rwsem and have to start
using the _nested helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Although we have start, len check for extent buffer reader/write (e.g.
read_extent_buffer()), these checks have limitations:
- No overflow check
Values like start = 1024 len = -1024 can still pass the basic
(start + len) > eb->len check.
- Checks are not consistent
For read_extent_buffer() we only check (start + len) against eb->len.
While for memcmp_extent_buffer() we also check start against eb->len.
- Different error reporting mechanism
We use WARN() in read_extent_buffer() but BUG() in
memcpy_extent_buffer().
- Still modify memory if the request is obviously wrong
In read_extent_buffer() even we find (start + len) > eb->len, we still
call memset(dst, 0, len), which can easily cause memory access error
if start + len overflows.
To address above problems, this patch creates a new common function to
check such access, check_eb_range().
- Add overflow check
This function checks start, start + len against eb->len and overflow
check.
- Unified checks
- Unified error reports
Will call WARN() if CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is configured.
And also do btrfs_warn() message for non-debug build.
- Exit ASAP if check fails
No more possible memory corruption.
- Add extra comment for @start @len used in those functions as it's
sometimes confused with the logical addressing instead of a range
inside the eb space
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202817
[ Inspired by above report, the report itself is already addressed ]
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ use check_add_overflow ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Delete repeated words in fs/btrfs/.
{to, the, a, and old}
and change "into 2 part" to "into 2 parts".
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cdvW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.9-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"Two small fixes and a bunch of lockdep fixes for warnings that show up
with an upcoming tree locking update but are valid with current locks
as well"
* tag 'for-5.9-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: tree-checker: fix the error message for transid error
btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers
btrfs: set the correct lockdep class for new nodes
btrfs: allocate scrub workqueues outside of locks
btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
btrfs: drop path before adding new uuid tree entry
btrfs: block-group: fix free-space bitmap threshold
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When removing an extent map at try_release_extent_mapping(), called through
the page release callback (btrfs_releasepage()), we always set the full
sync flag on the inode, which forces the next fsync to use a slower code
path.
This hurts performance for workloads that dirty an amount of data that
exceeds or is very close to the system's RAM memory and do frequent fsync
operations (like database servers can for example). In particular if there
are concurrent fsyncs against different files, by falling back to a full
fsync we do a lot more checksum lookups in the checksums btree, as we do
it for all the extents created in the current transaction, instead of only
the new ones since the last fsync. These checksums lookups not only take
some time but, more importantly, they also cause contention on the
checksums btree locks due to the concurrency with checksum insertions in
the btree by ordered extents from other inodes.
We actually don't need to set the full sync flag on the inode, because we
only remove extent maps that are in the list of modified extents if they
were created in a past transaction, in which case an fsync skips them as
it's pointless to log them. So stop setting the full fsync flag on the
inode whenever we remove an extent map.
This patch is part of a patchset that consists of 3 patches, which have
the following subjects:
1/3 btrfs: fix race between page release and a fast fsync
2/3 btrfs: release old extent maps during page release
3/3 btrfs: do not set the full sync flag on the inode during page release
Performance tests were ran against a branch (misc-next) containing the
whole patchset. The test exercises a workload where there are multiple
processes writing to files and fsyncing them (each writing and fsyncing
its own file), and in total the amount of data dirtied ranges from 2x to
4x the system's RAM memory (16GiB), so that the page release callback is
invoked frequently.
The following script, using fio, was used to perform the tests:
$ cat test-fsync.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdk
MNT=/mnt/sdk
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd"
MKFS_OPTIONS="-d single -m single"
if [ $# -ne 3 ]; then
echo "Use $0 NUM_JOBS FILE_SIZE FSYNC_FREQ"
exit 1
fi
NUM_JOBS=$1
FILE_SIZE=$2
FSYNC_FREQ=$3
cat <<EOF > /tmp/fio-job.ini
[writers]
rw=write
fsync=$FSYNC_FREQ
fallocate=none
group_reporting=1
direct=0
bs=64k
ioengine=sync
size=$FILE_SIZE
directory=$MNT
numjobs=$NUM_JOBS
thread
EOF
echo "Using config:"
echo
cat /tmp/fio-job.ini
echo
mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV &> /dev/null
mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT
fio /tmp/fio-job.ini
umount $MNT
The tests were performed for different numbers of jobs, file sizes and
fsync frequency. A qemu VM using kvm was used, with 8 cores (the host has
12 cores, with cpu governance set to performance mode on all cores), 16GiB
of ram (the host has 64GiB) and using a NVMe device directly (without an
intermediary filesystem in the host). While running the tests, the host
was not used for anything else, to avoid disturbing the tests.
The obtained results were the following, and the last line printed by
fio is pasted (includes aggregated throughput and test run time).
*****************************************************
**** 1 job, 32GiB file, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=29.1MiB/s (30.5MB/s), 29.1MiB/s-29.1MiB/s (30.5MB/s-30.5MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=1127557-1127557msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=29.3MiB/s (30.7MB/s), 29.3MiB/s-29.3MiB/s (30.7MB/s-30.7MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=1119042-1119042msec
(+0.7% throughput, -0.8% run time)
*****************************************************
**** 2 jobs, 16GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=33.5MiB/s (35.1MB/s), 33.5MiB/s-33.5MiB/s (35.1MB/s-35.1MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=979000-979000msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=39.9MiB/s (41.8MB/s), 39.9MiB/s-39.9MiB/s (41.8MB/s-41.8MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=821283-821283msec
(+19.1% throughput, -16.1% runtime)
*****************************************************
**** 4 jobs, 8GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=52.1MiB/s (54.6MB/s), 52.1MiB/s-52.1MiB/s (54.6MB/s-54.6MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=629130-629130msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=71.8MiB/s (75.3MB/s), 71.8MiB/s-71.8MiB/s (75.3MB/s-75.3MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=456357-456357msec
(+37.8% throughput, -27.5% runtime)
*****************************************************
**** 8 jobs, 4GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s), 76.1MiB/s-76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s-79.8MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=430708-430708msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=133MiB/s (140MB/s), 133MiB/s-133MiB/s (140MB/s-140MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=245458-245458msec
(+74.7% throughput, -43.0% run time)
*****************************************************
**** 16 jobs, 2GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=74.7MiB/s (78.3MB/s), 74.7MiB/s-74.7MiB/s (78.3MB/s-78.3MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=438625-438625msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=184MiB/s (193MB/s), 184MiB/s-184MiB/s (193MB/s-193MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=177864-177864msec
(+146.3% throughput, -59.5% run time)
*****************************************************
**** 32 jobs, 2GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=72.6MiB/s (76.1MB/s), 72.6MiB/s-72.6MiB/s (76.1MB/s-76.1MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=902615-902615msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=227MiB/s (238MB/s), 227MiB/s-227MiB/s (238MB/s-238MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=288936-288936msec
(+212.7% throughput, -68.0% run time)
*****************************************************
**** 64 jobs, 1GiB files, fsync frequency 1 ****
*****************************************************
Before patchset:
WRITE: bw=98.8MiB/s (104MB/s), 98.8MiB/s-98.8MiB/s (104MB/s-104MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=663126-663126msec
After patchset:
WRITE: bw=294MiB/s (308MB/s), 294MiB/s-294MiB/s (308MB/s-308MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=222940-222940msec
(+197.6% throughput, -66.4% run time)
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When removing an extent map at try_release_extent_mapping(), called through
the page release callback (btrfs_releasepage()), we never release an extent
map that is in the list of modified extents. This is to prevent races with
a concurrent fsync using the fast path, which could lead to not logging an
extent created in the current transaction.
However we can safely remove an extent map created in a past transaction
that is still in the list of modified extents (because no one fsynced yet
the inode after that transaction got commited), because such extents are
skipped during an fsync as it is pointless to log them. This change does
that.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When releasing an extent map, done through the page release callback, we
can race with an ongoing fast fsync and cause the fsync to miss a new
extent and not log it. The steps for this to happen are the following:
1) A page is dirtied for some inode I;
2) Writeback for that page is triggered by a path other than fsync, for
example by the system due to memory pressure;
3) When the ordered extent for the extent (a single 4K page) finishes,
we unpin the corresponding extent map and set its generation to N,
the current transaction's generation;
4) The btrfs_releasepage() callback is invoked by the system due to
memory pressure for that no longer dirty page of inode I;
5) At the same time, some task calls fsync on inode I, joins transaction
N, and at btrfs_log_inode() it sees that the inode does not have the
full sync flag set, so we proceed with a fast fsync. But before we get
into btrfs_log_changed_extents() and lock the inode's extent map tree:
6) Through btrfs_releasepage() we end up at try_release_extent_mapping()
and we remove the extent map for the new 4Kb extent, because it is
neither pinned anymore nor locked. By calling remove_extent_mapping(),
we remove the extent map from the list of modified extents, since the
extent map does not have the logging flag set. We unlock the inode's
extent map tree;
7) The task doing the fast fsync now enters btrfs_log_changed_extents(),
locks the inode's extent map tree and iterates its list of modified
extents, which no longer has the 4Kb extent in it, so it does not log
the extent;
8) The fsync finishes;
9) Before transaction N is committed, a power failure happens. After
replaying the log, the 4K extent of inode I will be missing, since
it was not logged due to the race with try_release_extent_mapping().
So fix this by teaching try_release_extent_mapping() to not remove an
extent map if it's still in the list of modified extents.
Fixes: ff44c6e36d ("Btrfs: do not hold the write_lock on the extent tree while logging")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Eric reported seeing this message while running generic/475
BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted
Full stack trace:
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2323: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction)
BTRFS info (device dm-0): forced readonly
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
------------[ cut here ]------------
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1894: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117)
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6480 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6488 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6490 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6498 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64c0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85e8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85f0 len 4096 err no 10
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 23985 at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:3084 btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs]
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4288 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4290 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4298 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c0 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42d0 len 4096 err no 10
CPU: 3 PID: 23985 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W L 5.8.0-rc4-default+ #1181
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffff909a44d17bd0 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: ffff8f3be41cb940 RSI: ffffffffb0108d2b RDI: ffffffffb0108ff7
RBP: ffff909a44d17e70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000037988 R12: ffff8f3bd20e4000
R13: ffff8f3bd20e4428 R14: 00000000ffffff8b R15: ffff909a44d17c70
FS: 00007f6a6ed3fb80(0000) GS:ffff8f3c3dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6a6ed3e000 CR3: 00000000525c0003 CR4: 0000000000160ee0
Call Trace:
? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0
? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
? lockref_put_or_lock+0x9/0x30
? dput+0x20/0x4a0
? dput+0x20/0x4a0
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
btrfs_sync_file+0x335/0x490 [btrfs]
do_fsync+0x38/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f6a6ef1b6e3
Code: Bad RIP value.
RSP: 002b:00007ffd01e20038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000007a120 RCX: 00007f6a6ef1b6e3
RDX: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RSI: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffd01e2004c
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000009f
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
irq event stamp: 0
hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
---[ end trace af146e0e38433456 ]---
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted
This ret came from btrfs_write_marked_extents(). If we get an aborted
transaction via EIO before, we'll see it in btree_write_cache_pages()
and return EUCLEAN, which gets printed as "Filesystem corrupted".
Except we shouldn't be returning EUCLEAN here, we need to be returning
EROFS because EUCLEAN is reserved for actual corruption, not IO errors.
We are inconsistent about our handling of BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR
elsewhere, but we want to use EROFS for this particular case. The
original transaction abort has the real error code for why we ended up
with an aborted transaction, all subsequent actions just need to return
EROFS because they may not have a trans handle and have no idea about
the original cause of the abort.
After patch "btrfs: don't WARN if we abort a transaction with EROFS" the
stacktrace will not be dumped either.
Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add full test stacktrace ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since there is not common cleanup run after the label it makes it
somewhat redundant.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Make the function directly return a pointer to a failure record and
adjust callers to handle it. Also refactor the logic inside so that
the case which allocates the failure record for the first time is not
handled in an 'if' arm, saving us a level of indentation. Finally make
the function static as it's not used outside of extent_io.c .
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
