IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In n_tty_read(), there is a separate int variable 'c' and is used only
to hold an int value returned from job_control(). There is also a
'retval' variable typed ssize_t. So drop this single occurrence of 'c'
and reuse 'retval' which is used on all other places to hold the value
returned from n_tty_read().
Note that 'retval' needs not be initialized now. Drop that.
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919085156.1578-2-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some count types are already 'size_t' for a long time. Some were
switched to 'size_t' recently. Unify the rest with those now.
This allows for some min_t()s to become min()s. And make one min()
an explicit min_t() as we are comparing signed 'room' to unsigned
'count'.
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827074147.2287-13-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The jiffies tests in n_tty_receive_overrun() are simplified ratelimiting
(without locking). We could use struct ratelimit_state and the helpers,
but to me, it occurs to be too complex for this use case.
But the code currently tests both if the time passed (the first
time_after()) and if jiffies wrapped around (the second time_after()).
time_is_before_jiffies() takes care of both, provided overrun_time is
initialized at the allocation time.
So switch to time_is_before_jiffies(), the same what ratelimiting does.
Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827074147.2287-5-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* Make 'tty' parameter const as we only look at tty flags here.
* Make 'size' parameter of size_t type as everyone passes that and
memset() (the consumer) expects size_t too. So be consistent.
* Remove redundant local variables, place the content directly to the
'if'.
* Use 0 instead of 0x00 in memset(). The former is more obvious.
No functional changes expected.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712064216.12150-3-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It is possible to hang pty devices in this case, the reader was
blocking at epoll on master side, the writer was sleeping at
wait_woken inside n_tty_write on slave side, and the write buffer
on tty_port was full, we found that the reader and writer would
never be woken again and blocked forever.
The problem was caused by a race between reader and kworker:
n_tty_read(reader): n_tty_receive_buf_common(kworker):
copy_from_read_buf()|
|room = N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - (ldata->read_head - tail)
|room <= 0
n_tty_kick_worker() |
|ldata->no_room = true
After writing to slave device, writer wakes up kworker to flush
data on tty_port to reader, and the kworker finds that reader
has no room to store data so room <= 0 is met. At this moment,
reader consumes all the data on reader buffer and calls
n_tty_kick_worker to check ldata->no_room which is false and
reader quits reading. Then kworker sets ldata->no_room=true
and quits too.
If write buffer is not full, writer will wake kworker to flush data
again after following writes, but if write buffer is full and writer
goes to sleep, kworker will never be woken again and tty device is
blocked.
This problem can be solved with a check for read buffer size inside
n_tty_receive_buf_common, if read buffer is empty and ldata->no_room
is true, a call to n_tty_kick_worker is necessary to keep flushing
data to reader.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 42458f41d0 ("n_tty: Ensure reader restarts worker for next reader")
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hui Li <caelli@tencent.com>
Message-ID: <1680749090-14106-1-git-send-email-caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When PARMRK is set, a character can result in up to 3 chars in the read
buffer. Receive code calculates for how many characters there (at
least) is room. Convert an opencoded rounding in the calculation to use
DIV_ROUND_UP().
Note: the room variable is decremented afterwards by one which ensures
the characters will fit into the buffer for real so the code is okay
despite rounding upwards.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309082035.14880-6-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use n_tty_receive_char_flow_ctrl also on the closing path. This makes
the code cleaner and consistent.
However, there a small change of regression!
The earlier closing path has a small difference compared with the
normal receive path. If START_CHAR and STOP_CHAR are equal, their
precedence is different depending on which path a character is
processed. I don't know whether this difference was intentional or
not, and if equal START_CHAR and STOP_CHAR is actually used anywhere.
But it feels not so useful corner case.
While this change would logically belong to those earlier changes,
having a separate patch for this is useful. If this regresses, bisect
can pinpoint this change rather than the large patch. Also, this
change is not necessary to minimal fix for the issue addressed in
the previous patch.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220606153652.63554-3-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When tty is not read from, XON/XOFF may get stuck into an
intermediate buffer. As those characters are there to do software
flow-control, it is not very useful. In the case where neither end
reads from ttys, the receiving ends might not be able receive the
XOFF characters and just keep sending more data to the opposite
direction. This problem is almost guaranteed to occur with DMA
which sends data in large chunks.
If TTY is slow to process characters, that is, eats less than given
amount in receive_buf, invoke lookahead for the rest of the chars
to process potential XON/XOFF characters.
We need to keep track of how many characters have been processed by the
lookahead to avoid processing the flow control char again on the normal
path. Bookkeeping occurs parallel on two layers (tty_buffer and n_tty)
to avoid passing the lookahead_count through the whole call chain.
When a flow-control char is processed, two things must occur:
a) it must not be treated as normal char
b) if not yet processed, flow-control actions need to be taken
The return value of n_tty_receive_char_flow_ctrl() tells caller a), and
b) is kept internal to n_tty_receive_char_flow_ctrl().
If characters were previous looked ahead, __receive_buf() makes two
calls to the appropriate n_tty_receive_buf_* function. First call is
made with lookahead_done=true for the characters that were subject to
lookahead earlier and then with lookahead=false for the new characters.
Either of the calls might be skipped when it has no characters to
handle.
Reported-by: Gilles Buloz <gilles.buloz@kontron.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220606153652.63554-2-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
TTYs in ICANON mode have a special case that allows "pushing" a line
without a regular EOL character (like newline), by using EOF (the EOT
character - ASCII 0x4) as a pseudo-EOL. It is silently discarded, so
the reader of the PTS will receive the line *without* EOF or any other
terminating character.
This special case has an edge case: What happens if the readers buffer
is the same size as the line (without EOF)? Will they be able to tell
if the whole line is received, i.e. if the next read() will return more
of the same line or the next line?
There are two possibilities, that both have (dis)advantages:
1. The next read() returns 0. FreeBSD (13.0) and OSX (10.11) do this.
Advantage: The reader can interpret this as "the line is over".
Disadvantage: read() returning 0 means EOF, the reader could also
interpret it as "there's no more data" and stop reading or even
close the PT.
2. The next read() returns the next line, the EOF is silently discarded.
Solaris (or at least OpenIndiana 2021.10) does this, Linux has done
do this since commit 40d5e0905a ("n_tty: Fix EOF push handling");
this behavior was recently broken by commit 3593030761 ("tty:
n_tty: do not look ahead for EOL character past the end of the buffer").
Advantage: read() won't return 0 (EOF), reader less likely to be
confused (and things like `while(read(..)>0)` don't break)
Disadvantage: The reader can't really know if the read() continues
the last line (that filled the whole read buffer) or starts a
new line.
As both options are defensible (and are used by other Unix-likes), it's
best to stick to the "old" behavior since "n_tty: Fix EOF push handling"
of 2013, i.e. silently discard that EOF.
This patch - that I actually got from Linus for testing and only
modified slightly - restores that behavior by skipping an EOF
character if it's the next character after reading is done.
Based on a patch from Linus Torvalds.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215611
Fixes: 3593030761 ("tty: n_tty: do not look ahead for EOL character past the end of the buffer")
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220329235810.452513-2-daniel@gibson.sh
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Daniel Gibson reports that the n_tty code gets line termination wrong in
very specific cases:
"If you feed a line with exactly 64 chars + terminating newline, and
directly afterwards (without reading) another line into a pseudo
terminal, the the first read() on the other side will return the 64
char line *without* terminating newline, and the next read() will
return the missing terminating newline AND the complete next line (if
it fits in the buffer)"
and bisected the behavior to commit 3b830a9c34 ("tty: convert
tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer").
Now, digging deeper, it turns out that the behavior isn't exactly new:
what changed in commit 3b830a9c34 was that the tty line discipline
.read() function is now passed an intermediate kernel buffer rather than
the final user space buffer.
And that intermediate kernel buffer is 64 bytes in size - thus that
special case with exactly 64 bytes plus terminating newline.
The same problem did exist before, but historically the boundary was not
the 64-byte chunk, but the user-supplied buffer size, which is obviously
generally bigger (and potentially bigger than N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, which
would hide the issue entirely).
The reason is that the n_tty canon_copy_from_read_buf() code would look
ahead for the EOL character one byte further than it would actually
copy. It would then decide that it had found the terminator, and unmark
it as an EOL character - which in turn explains why the next read
wouldn't then be terminated by it.
Now, the reason it did all this in the first place is related to some
historical and pretty obscure EOF behavior, see commit ac8f3bf883
("n_tty: Fix poll() after buffer-limited eof push read") and commit
40d5e0905a ("n_tty: Fix EOF push handling").
And the reason for the EOL confusion is that we treat EOF as a special
EOL condition, with the EOL character being NUL (aka "__DISABLED_CHAR"
in the kernel sources).
So that EOF look-ahead also affects the normal EOL handling.
This patch just removes the look-ahead that causes problems, because EOL
is much more critical than the historical "EOF in the middle of a line
that coincides with the end of the buffer" handling ever was.
Now, it is possible that we should indeed re-introduce the "look at next
character to see if it's a EOF" behavior, but if so, that should be done
not at the kernel buffer chunk boundary in canon_copy_from_read_buf(),
but at a higher level, when we run out of the user buffer.
In particular, the place to do that would be at the top of
'n_tty_read()', where we check if it's a continuation of a previously
started read, and there is no more buffer space left, we could decide to
just eat the __DISABLED_CHAR at that point.
But that would be a separate patch, because I suspect nobody actually
cares, and I'd like to get a report about it before bothering.
Fixes: 3b830a9c34 ("tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer")
Fixes: ac8f3bf883 ("n_tty: Fix poll() after buffer-limited eof push read")
Fixes: 40d5e0905a ("n_tty: Fix EOF push handling")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215611
Reported-and-tested-by: Daniel Gibson <metalcaedes@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The poll man page says POLLRDNORM is equivalent to POLLIN when used as
an event.
$ man poll
<snip>
POLLRDNORM
Equivalent to POLLIN.
However, in n_tty driver, POLLRDNORM does not return until timeout even
if there is terminal input, whereas POLLIN returns.
The following test program works until kernel-3.17, but the test stops
in poll() after commit 57087d5154 ("tty: Fix spurious poll() wakeups").
[Steps to run test program]
$ cc -o test-pollrdnorm test-pollrdnorm.c
$ ./test-pollrdnorm
foo <-- Type in something from the terminal followed by [RET].
The string should be echoed back.
------------------------< test-pollrdnorm.c >------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <unistd.h>
void main(void)
{
int n;
unsigned char buf[8];
struct pollfd fds[1] = {{ 0, POLLRDNORM, 0 }};
n = poll(fds, 1, -1);
if (n < 0)
perror("poll");
n = read(0, buf, 8);
if (n < 0)
perror("read");
if (n > 0)
write(1, buf, n);
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The attached patch fixes this problem. Many calls to
wake_up_interruptible_poll() in the kernel source code already specify
"POLLIN | POLLRDNORM".
Fixes: 57087d5154 ("tty: Fix spurious poll() wakeups")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu-ab1@nec.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/TYCPR01MB81901C0F932203D30E452B3EA5209@TYCPR01MB8190.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Pull bitmap updates from Yury Norov:
- introduce for_each_set_bitrange()
- use find_first_*_bit() instead of find_next_*_bit() where possible
- unify for_each_bit() macros
* tag 'bitmap-5.17-rc1' of git://github.com/norov/linux:
vsprintf: rework bitmap_list_string
lib: bitmap: add performance test for bitmap_print_to_pagebuf
bitmap: unify find_bit operations
mm/percpu: micro-optimize pcpu_is_populated()
Replace for_each_*_bit_from() with for_each_*_bit() where appropriate
find: micro-optimize for_each_{set,clear}_bit()
include/linux: move for_each_bit() macros from bitops.h to find.h
cpumask: replace cpumask_next_* with cpumask_first_* where appropriate
tools: sync tools/bitmap with mother linux
all: replace find_next{,_zero}_bit with find_first{,_zero}_bit where appropriate
cpumask: use find_first_and_bit()
lib: add find_first_and_bit()
arch: remove GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT entirely
include: move find.h from asm_generic to linux
bitops: move find_bit_*_le functions from le.h to find.h
bitops: protect find_first_{,zero}_bit properly
find_first{,_zero}_bit is a more effective analogue of 'next' version if
start == 0. This patch replaces 'next' with 'first' where things look
trivial.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Kernel-doc is a bit strict about some formatting. So fix these:
1) When there is a tab in comments, it thinks the line is a continuation
one. So the description of the functions end up as descriptions of
the last parameter described. Remove the tabs.
2) Remove newlines before parameters description and after the comments.
This was not wrong per se, only inconsistent with the rest of the
file.
3) Add periods to the end of sentences where appropriate.
4) Add "()" to function names and "%" to constants, so that they are
properly highlighted.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211126081611.11001-17-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* process_echoes doc was a misnomer
* isig and n_tty_receive_char docs were misplaced
* n_tty_read parameters were incorrect (from pre-cookie times)
So fix all the warnings at once:
624: warning: expecting prototype for process_echoes(). Prototype was for __process_echoes() instead
1110: warning: expecting prototype for isig(). Prototype was for __isig() instead
1264: warning: expecting prototype for n_tty_receive_char(). Prototype was for n_tty_receive_char_special() instead
2067: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'n_tty_read'
624: warning: expecting prototype for process_echoes(). Prototype was for __process_echoes() instead
1110: warning: expecting prototype for isig(). Prototype was for __isig() instead
1264: warning: expecting prototype for n_tty_receive_char(). Prototype was for n_tty_receive_char_special() instead
2067: warning: Function parameter or member 'kbuf' not described in 'n_tty_read'
2067: warning: Function parameter or member 'cookie' not described in 'n_tty_read'
2067: warning: Function parameter or member 'offset' not described in 'n_tty_read'
2067: warning: Excess function parameter 'buf' description in 'n_tty_read'
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211126081611.11001-16-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
